![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would have to look at the subsequent efforts from the other horses in the race. Which horses in the race ran significantly better in their NEXT start?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
How much better did they run in their following starts? Were any of the wins on turf? In maiden claiming races? On polytrack? Sloppy tracks? Cheaper tracks?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
2nd: finished second next out at 3 to 5.
3rd: finished second next out at 3 to 1. 4th: won next out at 2 to 1. 5th: 4th next out at 10 to 1. 6th: 4th next out at 7 to 5. 7th: won next out at even money. 8th: won (on turf) next out at 17 to 1. 9th: won (on polytrack) next out at 7 to 1. 10th: 6th next out at 5 to 1. 11th: yet to return. So, are you saying that a couple horses winning on another surface somehow indicates this was a key race? The horses that ran back on dirt pretty much sucked. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now, if you are advocating betting a horse off one poor dirt race first time on turf or polytrack merely because of who won, more power to you. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
well first of all there was some good breeding in the race..now zaftig destroyed them.. but i knew that they, the others in the race had some tallent..im not bing a dick... this time
..but you show me a race where there are 4 next out winners and 2 seconds regardless of surface..and ill take that all day.as a key race...... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whether we call them potential "key races" or not, don't we always have to evaluate the relative strengths of a particular race.
For example, today's third race at Belmont was about as ugly a $35,000 claiming race as you can get; I'd be inclined to throw everything out the next time these horses run. By contrast, the second race on Belmont Stakes Day looked to be a pretty strong maiden heat. I'd be inclined to upgrade horses coming out of that race when they run back. And we have to make these judgments before the entire field runs back. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Sales Topper from Fasig-Tipton Feb debuts at Arlington this weekend going 4.5 furlongs for Harty.
Desert Party ($2.5 million buy) beat out Munnings ($1.7 million) and Mr. Mistoffelees ($1.5 million) for that honor. By Street Cry out of a Tabasco Cat mare - 4.5f on polytrack doesn't seem like the type of situation you'd see a pedigree like that debut at. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
when there is no reason why a horse runs poorly I blame the rider...this horse is the goods ( :
if you did not bet against that horse today, and play HP seriously, then maybe one should consider playing a different game? Reading the article closely I thought Bafferts comments were a bit telling, bringing up real quite and running longer. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I haven't really looked at the Sunday card much yet, but at first glance that race seems tough. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i did not see it |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|