House Subcommittee Hearings

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

I'm sorry, maybe I'm missing something here, but why is it an inherently bad thing that the industry is examined by people who aren't horse racing insiders? It's not like the racing industry has done a great job on the national level of regulating itself.

In theory it is a good thing but a lot of things are good in theory

[slotdirt]

It just seems a lot of folks are dismissing the hearing as inherently bad for the sport. I don't necessarily think that is the case.

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

It just seems a lot of folks are dismissing the hearing as inherently bad for the sport. I don't necessarily think that is the case.

Hearings are supposed to be an exchange of info and viewpoints. This list of witnesses HAVE A PRONOUNCED AGENDA and it's been laid out in the first 90 minutes. And there is no counter-balanced opinion available....

"Use the IHA as a crowbar to create a governing body which has as its' sole interest the elimination of drugs of the game"

Now, that could turn out great in theory or it could be a giant clusterphuck.

[TheSpyder]

I think the point is there are many school of thought on what should be done, and several are based on inaccurate information. Chuck's made me understand the drug situation better than anyone, while several people we've heard from are pretty off base. This is a complicated issue and having people express their views (which may be wrong) leading the governments inquiry takes this whole attempt off track.

Having said that, the idea is good and the weight of the government weighing in may get some good things moving forward.

Spyder

Originally Posted by slotdirt

It just seems a lot of folks are dismissing the hearing as inherently bad for the sport. I don't necessarily think that is the case.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

It just seems a lot of folks are dismissing the hearing as inherently bad for the sport. I don't necessarily think that is the case.

I suppose you think that a one sided view of people pretty much bashing the sport is a good thing? This is an entirely one sided hearing with many misconceptions and untruths and generalizations being brought up as facts. There is no one there to dispute them because this 'witness' list is a loaded deck. Dont you think a racetrack vet or trainer that is still relevant would be a good guest? This is like a panel discussing politics and all the witnesses were Republicans.

[Cannon Shell]

As a matter of fact why wasn't Scot Waterman invited since he has been the industry's lead vet involving medication? Because he represents what the industry has done and is doing and we would not want that getting in the way of the obvious agenda here. I have been critical of the RMTC for various reasons but they are way better than what this group of politicians may create.

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

As a matter of fact why wasn't Scot Waterman invited since he has been the industry's lead vet involving medication? Because he represents what the industry has done and is doing and we would not want that getting in the way of the obvious agenda here. I have been critical of the RMTC for various reasons but they are way better than what this group of politicians may create.

And they andtheir work was casually dismissed by pathetic Randy Moss who reduces his stature in racing every time he opens his mouth lately. And predictably, his 'testimony' will be hailed in the coverage. You just watch...

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

As a matter of fact why wasn't Scot Waterman invited since he has been the industry's lead vet involving medication? Because he represents what the industry has done and is doing and we would not want that getting in the way of the obvious agenda here. I have been critical of the RMTC for various reasons but they are way better than what this group of politicians may create.

When I heard of the hearing the first person I thought would be invited in Scot Waterman. I couldn't believe it when I didnt see his name on the list..

[Kasept]

Resuming...

[Cannon Shell]

They keep refering to "drugs" without any specifics. Just get rid of drugs. What about the drugs that have been developed that are absolutely beneficial for horses?

[ddthetide]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I suppose you think that a one sided view of people pretty much bashing the sport is a good thing? This is an entirely one sided hearing with many misconceptions and untruths and generalizations being brought up as facts. There is no one there to dispute them because this 'witness' list is a loaded deck. Dont you think a racetrack vet or trainer that is still relevant would be a good guest? This is like a panel discussing politics and all the witnesses were Republicans.

IF You had a chance to speak at this hearing would you? just curious.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ddthetide

IF You had a chance to speak at this hearing would you? just curious.

Sure, why not? I would just bring Sammy Sosa's lawyer with me if they had any really tough questions.

[tiggerv]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

In theory it is a good thing but a lot of things are good in theory

Marge, I agree with you -- in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory.

- Homer J