![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
They don't look too live to me.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even the one who looks like lone speed?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
She was lone speed last time and caved readily. Why is today going to be different? And, aren't you worried that one of the two inside might have speed? I don't completely disagree with you, and am guessing you see that her better races were at Belmont, I'm just wondering how much horse she really is. But, I guess she could win. I'm just sort of married to another horse in the race....but unfortunately one with no speed.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The last one was longer and Ochre's not a bad horse (even though she crushed this one). . . The 6 seconds are obviously something to worry about but at least her win came at Belmont. I guess the 1 and 2 could have speed but it was a tough read for me. . .
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
you will not see kent hitting any small holes or ripping it up the rail in tight for a wile...imo
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I wouldn't bet Born to Be at 3-1 if my life depended on it. Shouldn't mind the distance but her previous form is nothing special and Matz horses get overbet sometimes. . . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|