![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(10) Derbies to see how they compare with this years prep races and whether they support or refute Steve and your thoughts about the Wood. Bob |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't have time to look them up right now, but if you go to my site and check the Breeder's Cup Archives, I imagine at least one Derby runner is in there most years.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() OK, I looked. Note for the pace call at 10f, I use 6f, not the mile most people use.
2007-127, 106 2006-125, 111 2005-128, 100 2004-114, 105 2003-121, 107 2002-112, 113 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Do you have a lower confidence level when making figures for Derby preps due to there being a limited sample of age/sex/distance races against which to compare the preps' fractions and final times? I've made and used my own pace/final figures and have found it far more difficult to have great confidence in figures I've made for infrequently run classifications (like a Derby prep) vs, say, a 6F or 8F race for older. When figure professionals say that the "track changed" for races like the Florida Derby and Arkansas Derby, is it mostly a case of the surface actually changing or more a reflection of the difficulty of assigning figures for these races? I guess that's two questions. Thanks. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't find them any harder to make than any other figures. It can be tough when it is the only route on the card, or it is surrounded by a turf races, but that isn't any different than your usual race card.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|