Past Posting Proven once again.....perhaps 49 combinations of one race!!

[deltagulf]

Originally Posted by justindew

For there to be a violation of law, there has to be malicious intent, and that might be tough to prove in this case.

why if cancelled the bettor has seen his horse or horses have no change of ticket coming in. some law against that.

[justindew]

Originally Posted by deltagulf

why if cancelled the bettor has seen his horse or horses have no change of ticket coming in. some law against that.

So then you're going to have to have some set standard as to when a horse is deemed to have "no chance" after the start. Does anyone really think we are going to see a law that says "when a confirmed front runner breaks slower than usual, he is herby deemed to have no chance. And any tickets using this horse that are cancelled after the start of the race, intentionally or unintentionally, can be used as proof of illegal activity"?

Prosecuting people for cancelling tickets at any time is impossible unless there is some other overt act, such as hacking into a computer or pushing a button that keep the pools open longer than allowed by law.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by justindew

So then you're going to have to have some set standard as to when a horse is deemed to have "no chance" after the start. Does anyone really think we are going to see a law that says "when a confirmed front runner breaks slower than usual, he is herby deemed to have no chance. And any tickets using this horse that are cancelled after the start of the race, intentionally or unintentionally, can be used as proof of illegal activity"?

Prosecuting people for cancelling tickets at any time is impossible unless there is some other overt act, such as hacking into a computer or pushing a button that keep the pools open longer than allowed by law.

According to what we are hearing, at least publically, they would have no idea if this was happening anyway.