![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
As with most things in racing, this is good for owners/trainers, bad for bettors. The BC used to be the one day you could count on big fields and competitive races. Not any more. Of course, nobody cares about bettors anyway.
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The dilution of the fields argument is a tepid one at best. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Because now we get smaller fields on the one day we used to be able to count on big fields. Just like the rest of the stakes races, the talent is going to get diluted among more races, period. Less horses in a race means less competition and shorter prices. That isn't bad for bettors?
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know about Euro attendance in 2008. Artificial surface presence expands the options for many of them, but they have to add the longer flight across country from NY. The generally-always-firm turf course is attractive to enough horses from Euro to be tempting (they don't all like ground with give in it). What was the Euro attendence at the last left coast BC, anybody recall?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If someone had a really top notch 2yo turf filly this year they could either take a shot against the boys in the juvenile turf OR try the dirt in the juvy fillies. Not next year. They can enter her in a BIG money 2yo turf race for fillies instead. Saying that it won't reduce field size is nonsensical. People could disagree on how big of an impact it will have....but it will certainly have an impact. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am not a fan of synthetic surface at major tracks, however if the 2008 BC is managed even half way decent, it should be a huge success as far as field size.
The surfaces have been around for a few years now and trainers are catching on. In 2008 you will get all the standard BC horses , + several polytrack specialists, + extra foriegn turf horses to run on synthetic. I don't think we will see negative effects until we move back to a dirt surface for a few years. I think a BC with a synthetic surface lowers the quality of the sport, but field size should increase. The Classic should absolutely have a fully loaded gate in 2008. If not then someone isn't doing their job. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
F & M sprint - 10 entries - 14 allowed Juv turf 1 mile - 12 entries - 12 allowed Dirt mile - 9 entries - 14 allowed 2007 Saturday: Juv Fillies - 14 entries - 14 allowed Juv colts - 13 - 14 allowed F & M turf - 12 entires - 14 allowed Sprint - 11 entries - 14 allowed Mile - 14 entries - 14 allowed Distaff - 12 entries - 14 allowed Turf - 8 entries - 14 allowed Classic - 9 entries - 14 allowed Here's the 2007 lists, including nominations under the Division click http://www.breederscup.com/content.aspx?id=28964 Who clearly moved from Saturday to Friday at time of entry? Seriously, let's figure it out to see how fields were affected by adding Friday.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|