Simpson arrested

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by nebrady

the only reason he got off was the prosecutors lead detective was quoting as saying he would do anything to frame a black person. hes charming yeah I guess when he doesn't have a knife in his hand. Buddy get a grip, bet you asked him for a autograph. Maybe you were with him when he went to get his memorabilia!

Nope...dont do the autograph thing. He was found not guilty. I am american...i believe in our justice system.

Originally Posted by dalakhani

I am american...i believe in our justice system.

He was found not guilty in the criminal case.
That does not mean he is innocent,
this is a very different outcome.

The guy cut up two people in a rage.
This is my assessment. I believe the probability
that I am correct is very high having watched the
trial and looking at the complete distortion of evidence
and the crappy job done by the prosecution.
Slick lawyers duped a frightened jury in a racially charged case.

I sorta have a hard time believing they charged him with
anything in Vegas though. Evidence, witnesses...
all lacking and very suspect based on what I
have read and seen.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by pgardn

He was found not guilty in the criminal case.
That does not mean he is innocent,
this is a very different outcome.

The guy cut up two people in a rage.
This is my assessment. I believe the probability
that I am correct is very high having watched the
trial and looking at the complete distortion of evidence
and the crappy job done by the prosecution.
Slick lawyers duped a frightened jury in a racially charged case.

I sorta have a hard time believing they charged him with
anything in Vegas though. Evidence, witnesses...
all lacking and very suspect based on what I
have read and seen.

Very fair. Very well said.

[Crown@club]

Whoopie! NEXT!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by pgardn

He was found not guilty in the criminal case.
That does not mean he is innocent,
this is a very different outcome.

The guy cut up two people in a rage.
This is my assessment. I believe the probability
that I am correct is very high having watched the
trial and looking at the complete distortion of evidence
and the crappy job done by the prosecution.
Slick lawyers duped a frightened jury in a racially charged case.

I sorta have a hard time believing they charged him with
anything in Vegas though. Evidence, witnesses...
all lacking and very suspect based on what I
have read and seen.

Glad u posted this. One crime committed, allegedly, doesn't have anything to do with the other. U wouldn't take a guy that's been charged with tax evasion, gotten off, and then say that because u think he was guilty of that, he should not be treated fairly in any subsequent cases. Whether or not u think he was guilty in the murders is beside the point. He didn't do anything that any of us wouldn't have done in the same situation. He had the money and the ability to hire the best lawyers out there and it was them that got OJ off. OJ didn't get himself off. Most important to me is that he should get the same rights any other citizen would get under the constitution. He was tried in a court and found not guilty. Making him guilty in this case to make him pay for the last one is not right.

Sometimes I'm amazed by the things I read on here. One of the things that make this country great is our constitution. So many people have fought and died for us to have the rights and freedoms we have now. It's amazing to me the little amount of respect it gets these days.

[Mortimer]

Hang 'im.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Glad u posted this. One crime committed, allegedly, doesn't have anything to do with the other. U wouldn't take a guy that's been charged with tax evasion, gotten off, and then say that because u think he was guilty of that, he should not be treated fairly in any subsequent cases. Whether or not u think he was guilty in the murders is beside the point. He didn't do anything that any of us wouldn't have done in the same situation. He had the money and the ability to hire the best lawyers out there and it was them that got OJ off. OJ didn't get himself off. Most important to me is that he should get the same rights any other citizen would get under the constitution. He was tried in a court and found not guilty. Making him guilty in this case to make him pay for the last one is not right.Sometimes I'm amazed by the things I read on here. One of the things that make this country great is our constitution. So many people have fought and died for us to have the rights and freedoms we have now. It's amazing to me the little amount of respect it gets these days.

that's true!!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I don't think anyone here is saying he's guilty in this case for some sort of revenge in the last case. That's ridiculous. However, his being guilty of committing those murders should be part of this discussion. It's a little more serious than tax evasion. I realize you were trying to be comparitive, but the murder of 2 people and they horrific way it was done does stick out and will for the rest of that piece of sh*t's life.

The guy was found guilty in the civil trial and paid virtually no restitution to the families that lost their loved ones. He did however co write a book entitled "If I did It". When he found out that if he made money from the book, he would have to give some to the Goldman's or Brown's, he tried to stop it from being published. Nice.

Sometimes I'm amazed at the lengths you will go to to defend scumbags. Dog killers, murderers they have a voice with you. Makes me sick.

Just as in the Vick case, I'm being accused of defending someone when I'm not defending him at all. Did I say at any point that he's not guilty? No. I am only speaking to the fact that everyone deserves the same rights and protections, whether it's you, me, or OJ. You also might notice that I didn't chime in on my feelings about the murder and whether I think he's guilty or innocent there. Why should I? Look at what you said, "his being guilty of committing those murders should be part of this discussion." That's fine except for one important thing.........he was tried in a court of law and found not guilty. Whether or not you believe that was the wrong decision is irrelevant now. According to the records, by him being found not guilty, it would be absolutely wrong to use that past crime to establish any kind of pattern of behavior for him. In my opinion, that makes the murders a non-issue here. This case should only be about whether or not he committed THIS crime and this crime only.

[Danzig]

speaking of vick...that one tested positive for marijuana earlier this month. oops.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Please. You are so transparent.

transparent only that he respects the constitution and our justice system. If a man is found "not guilty" in a criminal court of law on one crime, why should that be even considered when judging him on a totally seperate matter?

How does that make logical sense?

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Again, please. This is a guy, who you yourself said, based on the evidence he probably did it. Yet you speak about what a charming person he is. Charming as long as he's not slicing your throat.

I said, one crime has nothing to do with the other, obviously. However, knowing what he was tried for, and that most people with a brain think he did it, it doesn't speak well that he would get involved in something else like this. Or the book, which you have avoided making a comment on. Wonder why......Let me guess, you defended Vick blindly also.

But that is not how the justice system works. If I were tried (and acquitted) for robbing a bank ten years ago why should it have that anything to do with say a manslaughter charge 12 years later? What if i were wrongly charged for the first crime?

I can only speak to what i know. Do i think he probably killed those people? Yes, I do. Do i know for sure? No i dont. Neither do you! There is reasonable doubt you, me and everyone else might be wrong...but it still has nothing to do with this case.

Look at the facts for this case as what they are. Check out the witnesses. A little shaky huh?

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I need to know, do you keep avoiding the book deal and the fact that he has made little to no restitution to the families who lost loved ones, because you have no defense? I understand not having a defense for those things, but at the same time I would have a hard time defending a guy who killed 2 people....EVER on any subject.

He claims that he doesnt owe the restitution because he didnt commit the crimes. Why would anyone pay if they claim they were innocent? Wouldnt that be dumb?

As for the book deal, it is FICTIONAL. It was always supposed to be.

And who is defending anyone? More than anything, I am defending the constitution.

[my miss storm cat]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

but at the same time I would have a hard time defending a guy who killed 2 people....EVER on any subject.

Same here.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

But he was found guilty in the civil trial right? So what's your opinion on that, other than to avoid it? And in your opinion, did he do it?

Not found "guilty" but found to be responsible which is a totally different thing.

In my opinion, with the evidence presented, it appears that he most likely did it. But who is to say that the evidence wasnt tainted? Still waiting for those wmd's in Iraq.

No Wmd's In Iraq = Oj Innocent

[Mortimer]

I tihnk since he admitted he cut his finger...badly....just a few hours before the night the murders took place..yet had not the foggiest how he cut that finger....that's kinda strange.

Now that's not tainted...that is fact from Simpson. I know it was not entered into the trial.




But it's kinda strange.

[Mortimer]

WHAT!!





ror!

Cochrane was the smart guy...Darden was a nimrod!

Kardashian got O.J. off

[ArlJim78]

i just want to state for the record, that on this issue, or any issue really, I am 100% behind Kardashian.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Sorry. I'm so dumb.

Morty=Cochrane Jr.

Well I would certainly hope so!