Litf

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

Retiring this fraud would be the smartest thing to do.

At least now .... they can still find and convince some gullible investors into believing that he's the real goods ... and was just "unlucky" or "injured" in his only two starts against quality sprinters.

If they race him any more ... even the most gullible rubes will finally catch on.

"Yup ... he won the Eclipse Award last year ... gonna make a real fine stallion."

you'd think an outstanding handicapper such as yourself would want him to keep running--that way you could get a better price on your winners.

lol oh, wait. there's not much betting in this country for those who predict a loser, rather than naming a winner, is there?? you brave soul you, bucking the odds of choosing one loser from many, rather than taking the easy way of picking the one winner!

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Danzig188

you'd think an outstanding handicapper such as yourself would want him to keep running--that way you could get a better price on your winners.

lol oh, wait. there's not much betting in this country for those who predict a loser, rather than naming a winner, is there?? you brave soul you, bucking the odds of choosing one loser from many, rather than taking the easy way of picking the one winner!

Winners?
Never saw one from him.
Just "trash talk" from the loser.
Winners?
You're speaking a different language, Danzig.

Funny...most of us are on to this puffed up fraud. Didn't take long.

[31lengths]

Actually, I just got back from Calder and was in the paddock area most of the day yeaterday. He looked like there was something wrong the whole time he was there. He moped and didnt raise his head at all. He was the only one acting like that. I thought something was amiss at that time.

Originally Posted by Danzig188

you'd think an outstanding handicapper such as yourself would want him to keep running--that way you could get a better price on your winners.

lol oh, wait. there's not much betting in this country for those who predict a loser, rather than naming a winner, is there?? you brave soul you, bucking the odds of choosing one loser from many, rather than taking the easy way of picking the one winner!

The entire premise of your question is mistaken. Perhaps you haven't read my past posts ... which is completely understandable.

But I've posted many times that I am not a "handicapper" ... I haven't placed a serious bet on a horse since 1967. I don't have the time that's required to follow day-to-day racing to the extent that's needed in order to be a successful bettor ... and I know it ... that's why I don't bet.

But I do have the time to watch and analyze G1 dirt racing ... which is what I've been doing since 1958 ... and I'm knowledgable enough to recognize when a horse doesn't finish his races with conviction against weak fields ... and is thus very vulnerable against strong fields.

Lost In The Fog is not himself a fraud ... he's just a horse ... it's the over-the-top over-evaluation he was given by naïve goo-goos that was ... and is ... fraudulent.

You do understand that ... don't you?

[Downthestretch55]

Here's my take on this Danzig....

Excuses are for LOSERS!!!
Winners don't have to make up excuses, because they won.

Duh????
See previous post. ^^^