Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2007, 11:03 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

i was in the minority about seabiscuit. i thought they took a very good book, and turned it into typical hollywood garbage. the filming was good, the race scenes, but the actual writing, and the whole good vs evil crap...and then turning war admiral into some huge black monster of a horse, that was laughable.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2007, 12:46 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

You and I can be in the minority together about "Seabiscuit," Danzig. I loved the book and disliked the movie (and I really tried to like it). It's not the inaccuracies for me (I'm still watching the sucky "The Tudors," somehow) so much as the g*dd*mned narration. I hate narration in movies (with a few exceptions so don't y'all start sending me examples of excellent movies using narration because yes, I know there are some). In my opinion, film is a visual medium and if you can't tell the story purely through the pictures and the action then you're not telling it well.

As for "Ruffian"- I thought it was all right for what it was, but the story was weak. It's a story that doesn't have an inherent dramatic arc (whatever else one thinks about Ruffian, a story about a perfect filly who breaks down in her last race and is destroyed doesn't really have a dramatic arc from a storytelling point of view, while Seabiscuit's, for comparison, had more ups and downs than a rollercoaster, which is good for drama) All of the characters were essentially at the same place at the end of the film as they were in the beginning (the only way we knew it had permanently affected Nack's love affair with the track was through... yes, the g*dd*mn narration) and no one else was any different at the end. So, someone unfamiliar with Ruffian is left saying, "So what? Why bother to tell the story?"

I think I would tell my non-racing friends that the first two-thirds are pretty slow and the last third is incredibly sad.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2007, 03:36 PM
Stall Mucker's Avatar
Stall Mucker Stall Mucker is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 153
Default "In A NY Minute"

I thought the movie was OK. More, I thought Bill Nack played to big a part and I don't remember him crossing the track before the race was over.
That aside, I was at Saratoga to see her and all I can report is that I never saw such a STUNNING Filly. Glad to be there. I dream for the day to see another.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2007, 05:43 PM
slewpy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
You and I can be in the minority together about "Seabiscuit," Danzig. I loved the book and disliked the movie (and I really tried to like it). It's not the inaccuracies for me (I'm still watching the sucky "The Tudors," somehow) so much as the g*dd*mned narration. I hate narration in movies (with a few exceptions so don't y'all start sending me examples of excellent movies using narration because yes, I know there are some). In my opinion, film is a visual medium and if you can't tell the story purely through the pictures and the action then you're not telling it well.

As for "Ruffian"- I thought it was all right for what it was, but the story was weak. It's a story that doesn't have an inherent dramatic arc (whatever else one thinks about Ruffian, a story about a perfect filly who breaks down in her last race and is destroyed doesn't really have a dramatic arc from a storytelling point of view, while Seabiscuit's, for comparison, had more ups and downs than a rollercoaster, which is good for drama) All of the characters were essentially at the same place at the end of the film as they were in the beginning (the only way we knew it had permanently affected Nack's love affair with the track was through... yes, the g*dd*mn narration) and no one else was any different at the end. So, someone unfamiliar with Ruffian is left saying, "So what? Why bother to tell the story?"

I think I would tell my non-racing friends that the first two-thirds are pretty slow and the last third is incredibly sad.
wanna be my friend? cause your smart
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2007, 05:46 PM
slewpy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Danzig]i was in the minority about seabiscuit. i thought they took a very good book, and turned it into typical hollywood garbage. the filming was good, the race scenes, but the actual writing, and the whole good vs evil crap...and then turning war admiral into some huge black monster of a horse, that was laughable.[/QUOT bet on vaca city flyer next out at hollywood
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.