![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nice edit!!! Glad I could be of some assistance, of course this then becomes a top 11 list, and you now have Cigar not in the top ten but do include Fu Peg(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and Candy Ride(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!). Go find me two sane human beings that think that Candy Ride and FuPeg rate above Cigar and get back to me. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
sorry azzhole, it was thunder gulch's post that reminded me. I should probably take off Cigar and put in Left Bank instead |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Azeri was a great two-turn miler-plus. She was managed quite well in her early days to exploit her area of expertise, and she became a champion because many track managers have decided that poor, delicate female horses can't run farther than 9f. But when she tried one turn races, at 7f and 9f, and distances beyond 9f, she was beaten. She was no Personal Ensign, no Susan's Girl, no Princess Rooney, no Bayakoa or Paseana.
Restore the BC Distaff to 10f, I say! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You being sarcastic or sincere? I hope the former. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If that happens im moving to Canada |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's see, what do Run Dusty Run, Sanhedrin, and Iron Constitution have in common, besides being horses most of you never heard of? They placed in Triple Crown races behind Seattle Slew, the first two more than once. Except for J.O. Tobin, who was real head-case with gobs of talent but couldn't be depended on to run his race on the track and not the paddock, his classic generation was not loaded with memorable horses.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But his performance as a 4YO wiped away all doubt. Now here's something which will start an argument ... I do not consider Ruffian to be rankable among the greats ... I think she was the most electric and talented filly I've ever seen ... but I rate her actual career on the racetrack as "Incomplete" .... because ... ... she only beat an extremely weak crop of fillies her own age ... never beat older fillies ... and never beat colts. She "probably" could have done those things ... but woulda/shoulda/coulda doesn't count. Just as Seattle Slew had to be doubted after his 3YO season ended early ... so too with Ruffian. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
You keep using logic and historical perception and facts and you are really gonna **** up a lot of people here.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why does a female need to beat males in order to be great? I dont understand that logic.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
These are my top 10 for the past 25 years, in no particular order (actually alphabetical, since it would be too difficult to rank them 1-10).
Alysheba, Cigar, Easy Goer, Ghostzapper, John Henry, Risen Star, Skip Away, Slew O Gold, Spend A Buck, Sunday Silence. No, I don't buy into the theory that top horses are better now than 20 years ago. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If accomplishing all those feats isn't greatness, I don't know what is. Last edited by kentuckyrosesinmay : 07-06-2006 at 11:42 AM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But she did those things while beating up on a bunch of sad sack fillies her own age. How would she have performed against tougher, older fillies or a tough colt like Foolish Pleasure? Would she have run as well as she did against the easy opposition ... or would she have cracked when challenged by a good horse ... like Lost In The Fog did? And don't say, "I think she woulda/coulda/shoulda" ... because that doesn't count. I loved Ruffian as much as anyone did ... but ... based on her actual races ... I can't give her a specific ranking among the great fillies ... I can only give her an "Incomplete." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|