Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2006, 10:41 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
**** you oracle and your sanctimonious bs.

Jerrys TOp horses in the last 10 years

1.Dubai Millennium---GHOSTZAPPER
2.Rock Of Gibraltar
3.Candy Ride
4.Point Given
5.Fusaichi Pegasus
6.Mineshaft--see there he is
7.Azeri
8.High Chapparal
9.Dalakhani
10.Cigar

Nice edit!!! Glad I could be of some assistance, of course this then becomes a top 11 list, and you now have Cigar not in the top ten but do include Fu Peg(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and Candy Ride(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!). Go find me two sane human beings that think that Candy Ride and FuPeg rate above Cigar and get back to me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2006, 10:43 AM
Seattleallstar's Avatar
Seattleallstar Seattleallstar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Nice edit!!! Glad I could be of some assistance, of course this then becomes a top 11 list, and you now have Cigar not in the top ten but do include Fu Peg(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and Candy Ride(LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!). Go find me two sane human beings that think that Candy Ride and FuPeg rate above Cigar and get back to me.

sorry azzhole, it was thunder gulch's post that reminded me. I should probably take off Cigar and put in Left Bank instead
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2006, 10:53 AM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Azeri was a great two-turn miler-plus. She was managed quite well in her early days to exploit her area of expertise, and she became a champion because many track managers have decided that poor, delicate female horses can't run farther than 9f. But when she tried one turn races, at 7f and 9f, and distances beyond 9f, she was beaten. She was no Personal Ensign, no Susan's Girl, no Princess Rooney, no Bayakoa or Paseana.

Restore the BC Distaff to 10f, I say!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2006, 10:57 AM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann
Azeri was a great two-turn miler-plus. She was managed quite well in her early days to exploit her area of expertise, and she became a champion because many track managers have decided that poor, delicate female horses can't run farther than 9f. But when she tried one turn races, at 7f and 9f, and distances beyond 9f, she was beaten. She was no Personal Ensign, no Susan's Girl, no Princess Rooney, no Bayakoa or Paseana.

Restore the BC Distaff to 10f, I say!
I personally think that races should not be further than 1 1/8 miles.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:01 AM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
I personally think that races should not be further than 1 1/8 miles.

You being sarcastic or sincere? I hope the former.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:03 AM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann
You being sarcastic or sincere? I hope the former.
I was being sarcastic. The industry in the US is speed speed and more speed. Wouldnt surprise me at all if the powers that be shortens up the Classic.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:19 AM
Seattleallstar's Avatar
Seattleallstar Seattleallstar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
I was being sarcastic. The industry in the US is speed speed and more speed. Wouldnt surprise me at all if the powers that be shortens up the Classic.

If that happens im moving to Canada
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:00 AM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Let's see, what do Run Dusty Run, Sanhedrin, and Iron Constitution have in common, besides being horses most of you never heard of? They placed in Triple Crown races behind Seattle Slew, the first two more than once. Except for J.O. Tobin, who was real head-case with gobs of talent but couldn't be depended on to run his race on the track and not the paddock, his classic generation was not loaded with memorable horses.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:27 AM
Bold Brooklynite
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann
Let's see, what do Run Dusty Run, Sanhedrin, and Iron Constitution have in common, besides being horses most of you never heard of? They placed in Triple Crown races behind Seattle Slew, the first two more than once. Except for J.O. Tobin, who was real head-case with gobs of talent but couldn't be depended on to run his race on the track and not the paddock, his classic generation was not loaded with memorable horses.
If Seattle Slew had been retired after hs 3YO year ... I would have had grave doubts about calling him "great" ... for the very reasons you cite ... namely pizz-poor opposition.

But his performance as a 4YO wiped away all doubt.

Now here's something which will start an argument ...

I do not consider Ruffian to be rankable among the greats ... I think she was the most electric and talented filly I've ever seen ... but I rate her actual career on the racetrack as "Incomplete" .... because ...

... she only beat an extremely weak crop of fillies her own age ... never beat older fillies ... and never beat colts. She "probably" could have done those things ... but woulda/shoulda/coulda doesn't count.

Just as Seattle Slew had to be doubted after his 3YO season ended early ... so too with Ruffian.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:33 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You keep using logic and historical perception and facts and you are really gonna **** up a lot of people here.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:36 AM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why does a female need to beat males in order to be great? I dont understand that logic.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:44 AM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

These are my top 10 for the past 25 years, in no particular order (actually alphabetical, since it would be too difficult to rank them 1-10).

Alysheba, Cigar, Easy Goer, Ghostzapper, John Henry, Risen Star, Skip Away, Slew O Gold, Spend A Buck, Sunday Silence.

No, I don't buy into the theory that top horses are better now than 20 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-06-2006, 11:39 AM
kentuckyrosesinmay's Avatar
kentuckyrosesinmay kentuckyrosesinmay is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UNC-CH will always miss Eve Carson. RIP.
Posts: 1,874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
If Seattle Slew had been retired after hs 3YO year ... I would have had grave doubts about calling him "great" ... for the very reasons you cite ... namely pizz-poor opposition.

But his performance as a 4YO wiped away all doubt.

Now here's something which will start an argument ...

I do not consider Ruffian to be rankable among the greats ... I think she was the most electric and talented filly I've ever seen ... but I rate her actual career on the racetrack as "Incomplete" .... because ...

... she only beat an extremely weak crop of fillies her own age ... never beat older fillies ... and never beat colts. She "probably" could have done those things ... but woulda/shoulda/coulda doesn't count.

Just as Seattle Slew had to be doubted after his 3YO season ended early ... so too with Ruffian.
Yeah, but Ruffian set or equalled stakes/track records every time out. She won at different tracks at different distances ranging from five and a half furlongs to 1 1/2 miles, and never lost. She won the filly TC. In the great match race, the jock was the regular rider of both Foolish Pleasure and Ruffian. He decided to ride Ruffian. They decided to race against Foolish Pleasure because he was the best colt in the country at the time. Lucian Lauren once said that she might even be as great as Secretariat.

If accomplishing all those feats isn't greatness, I don't know what is.

Last edited by kentuckyrosesinmay : 07-06-2006 at 11:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-06-2006, 12:07 PM
Bold Brooklynite
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Yeah, but Ruffian set or equalled stakes/track records every time out. She won at different tracks at different distances ranging from five and a half furlongs to 1 1/2 miles, and never lost.
True ... true ... true.

But she did those things while beating up on a bunch of sad sack fillies her own age. How would she have performed against tougher, older fillies or a tough colt like Foolish Pleasure?

Would she have run as well as she did against the easy opposition ... or would she have cracked when challenged by a good horse ... like Lost In The Fog did?

And don't say, "I think she woulda/coulda/shoulda" ... because that doesn't count. I loved Ruffian as much as anyone did ... but ... based on her actual races ... I can't give her a specific ranking among the great fillies ... I can only give her an "Incomplete."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.