Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:40 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I don't think Time Squared is a throw out here, he won that last race pretty easily IMO, Frenchie had the horse in hand the whole time....
he had him in hand? he won by a length in 1:45.6 against maidens.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:41 PM
POINTGIVEN1985 POINTGIVEN1985 is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,236
Default

none of the times on poly route races have been very fast.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:55 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by POINTGIVEN1985
none of the times on poly route races have been very fast.
Really? On the very same day as Timed Squareds race, later in the card was an allowance race for older horses that was run at the same 1 1/16 distance.
Here are the fractions for both races.

Current track record at the distance 1:41.6

25.53 50.35 1:15 1:39.69 1:45.68 Time Squared
24.66 47.88 1:11.8 1:35.91 1:41.94 Rathor


The allowance horses were almost four seconds faster.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2007, 08:08 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Really? On the very same day as Timed Squareds race, later in the card was an allowance race for older horses that was run at the same 1 1/16 distance.
Here are the fractions for both races.

Current track record at the distance 1:41.6

25.53 50.35 1:15 1:39.69 1:45.68 Time Squared
24.66 47.88 1:11.8 1:35.91 1:41.94 Rathor


The allowance horses were almost four seconds faster.
Oh Jim, you and your facts. Can't a guy just believe that Time Squared will probably destroy Great Hunter and Street Sense without getting distracted by the fact that he is a slow animal and they are not?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2007, 11:12 PM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Really? On the very same day as Timed Squareds race, later in the card was an allowance race for older horses that was run at the same 1 1/16 distance.
Here are the fractions for both races.

Current track record at the distance 1:41.6

25.53 50.35 1:15 1:39.69 1:45.68 Time Squared
24.66 47.88 1:11.8 1:35.91 1:41.94 Rathor


The allowance horses were almost four seconds faster.
Pace makes the race. Time Squared closed into a glacial pace, which is pretty hard to do most of the time. He was dead last at the quarter while they were poking along ahead of him, still 9th at the 3/4 mark. Closed with a rush to just get up in the last couple of strides. The comments, by the way, say "hopped start, 8 wide lane, driving."

Notice that the time from the 3/4 mark to the finish in each race is comparable - 30.68 sec vs. 30.14 sec. And Time Squared was still a long way back at the 3/4, while Rathor was right up near the lead.

All that said, I still like Great Hunter best.

Last edited by Pedigree Ann : 04-11-2007 at 11:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2007, 11:58 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann
Pace makes the race. Time Squared closed into a glacial pace, which is pretty hard to do most of the time. He was dead last at the quarter while they were poking along ahead of him, still 9th at the 3/4 mark. Closed with a rush to just get up in the last couple of strides. The comments, by the way, say "hopped start, 8 wide lane, driving."

Notice that the time from the 3/4 mark to the finish in each race is comparable - 30.68 sec vs. 30.14 sec. And Time Squared was still a long way back at the 3/4, while Rathor was right up near the lead.
So what is your conclusion? That Time Squared could have run a race comparable to Rathor's if he just would have had the pace to run into?
I don't care what the pace is you're not going to move the final time up four seconds.

Its impressive to close into a slow pace and end up with a reasonably fast overall time. But if you close into a slow pace and its won in a slow time its just a slow race.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-2007, 01:46 AM
easy goer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
So what is your conclusion? That Time Squared could have run a race comparable to Rathor's if he just would have had the pace to run into?
I don't care what the pace is you're not going to move the final time up four seconds.

Its impressive to close into a slow pace and end up with a reasonably fast overall time. But if you close into a slow pace and its won in a slow time its just a slow race.

Not necessarily, horses can go out awfully slow and still be impressive if they finish strongly. Saving time on the front end does not translate into an equally fast finish.

A good example: The 1978 Belmont Stakes.

How many lengths did this horse make up in the final 2 1/2 furloughs??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-12-2007, 09:32 AM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by easy goer
Not necessarily, horses can go out awfully slow and still be impressive if they finish strongly. Saving time on the front end does not translate into an equally fast finish.

A good example: The 1978 Belmont Stakes.

How many lengths did this horse make up in the final 2 1/2 furloughs??
Horses can go out slow and finish strongly and look impressive, yes. But how impressive they look depends in large part on who they are running against.

We were talking specifically about Time Squared and how his 8.5 furlong winning time was the slowest of three run at the distance last friday. Not only did the allowance horses run nearly four seconds faster, another group of maidens ran about 1.5 seconds faster.

However everyone seems most excited about Time Squared's race because he closed ground. I just feel that this horse will have no solution when facing horses that have proven that they can run fast early, middle, and late.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-12-2007, 05:46 PM
POINTGIVEN1985 POINTGIVEN1985 is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by easy goer
Not necessarily, horses can go out awfully slow and still be impressive if they finish strongly. Saving time on the front end does not translate into an equally fast finish.

A good example: The 1978 Belmont Stakes.

How many lengths did this horse make up in the final 2 1/2 furloughs??
DONT BOTHER HE IS ALWAYS CORRECT....ALWAYS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-12-2007, 10:29 AM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
So what is your conclusion? .
My conclusion is that Time Squared won a slow race; I don't have enough data to tell whether he is a slow horse, especially the way the race was run.

Once the ones in front had gone 6f in 1:15, there was no way that TS could have recorded a fast time for the race - he would have had to run 2.5f in 26seconds or so to match Rathor's time (27 seconds if he had been on the lead, which he wasn't by any means).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-12-2007, 03:35 PM
easy goer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah, I would like to know more about the race before writing this horse off. Someone said he ran green in the lane.Did anyone see the race? Looks like he can close...Besides you dont have to find a winner, only a horse that can hit the board that no one else knows about.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:46 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
he had him in hand? he won by a length in 1:45.6 against maidens.
1) Gotta pay him back for the 2k hit that day
2) He really didn't use him until the last 1 furlong IMO, he just looped them and then let him go
3) Time only matters in jail
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:51 PM
AeWingnut's Avatar
AeWingnut AeWingnut is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
1) Gotta pay him back for the 2k hit that day
2) He really didn't use him until the last 1 furlong IMO, he just looped them and then let him go
3) Time only matters in jail
My uncle always said that. Well his quote was "Time only matters when you're doing it"

Do you think that since Any Given Saturday came back from the Tampa Derby to run bad that Street Sense could throw in a clunker? I don't mean run 2nd. I mean run out of the Tri.

I have to say that Street Sense has always been my horse. He will be running on the turn and by the time the camera switches angles for the home stretch, he's jumped to the lead.

Does anyone have his works since the Tampa Bay Derby?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2007, 08:06 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut
My uncle always said that. Well his quote was "Time only matters when you're doing it"

Do you think that since Any Given Saturday came back from the Tampa Derby to run bad that Street Sense could throw in a clunker? I don't mean run 2nd. I mean run out of the Tri.

I have to say that Street Sense has always been my horse. He will be running on the turn and by the time the camera switches angles for the home stretch, he's jumped to the lead.

Does anyone have his works since the Tampa Bay Derby?
I think Street Sense is far less likely to "throw in a clunker" here than AGS last week.
AGS was originally pointed to this race (which was 4 weeks after his last) and then switched to a race 3 weeks out at the last minute.
Street Sense will have another week off and presumably will have had a more appropriate training schedule because he has been pointing to this race all along. There is also the small fact that I think SS is simply a better horse than AGS.
That being said....I still like Great Hunter.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-11-2007, 09:39 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut
My uncle always said that. Well his quote was "Time only matters when you're doing it"

Do you think that since Any Given Saturday came back from the Tampa Derby to run bad that Street Sense could throw in a clunker? I don't mean run 2nd. I mean run out of the Tri.

I have to say that Street Sense has always been my horse. He will be running on the turn and by the time the camera switches angles for the home stretch, he's jumped to the lead.

Does anyone have his works since the Tampa Bay Derby?
If you want to watch his work from April 5th, you can go to the below link:

http://ww2.keeneland.com/racing/list...x?cat=Workouts
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-11-2007, 09:56 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
If you want to watch his work from April 5th, you can go to the below link:

http://ww2.keeneland.com/racing/list...x?cat=Workouts
Nice! I hadn't seen that feature yet of their website, thanks so much.
__________________
Tod Marks Photo - Daybreak over Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-11-2007, 09:59 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Nice! I hadn't seen that feature yet of their website, thanks so much.
I thought Teuflesberg looked the best in his work, but I think he might be in over his head at this distance. I can see him being a serious sprinter.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-11-2007, 10:19 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
I thought Teuflesberg looked the best in his work, but I think he might be in over his head at this distance. I can see him being a serious sprinter.
he does have a beautiful reach to his stride when asked. Deadly Dealer looked like he was going to explode if they didn't allow him to run.
__________________
Tod Marks Photo - Daybreak over Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-11-2007, 10:22 PM
saucon17's Avatar
saucon17 saucon17 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bethlehem, Pa.
Posts: 1,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
I thought Teuflesberg looked the best in his work, but I think he might be in over his head at this distance. I can see him being a serious sprinter.
Agree, I think he will a great a 6f to 7f horse and possibly
a one turn mile horse.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-12-2007, 11:07 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
If you want to watch his work from April 5th, you can go to the below link:

http://ww2.keeneland.com/racing/list...x?cat=Workouts
Wow. You wanna see a racehorse in a perfect workout, turn on Street Sense and watch him explode when the rider gives the cue. Didn't even seem to work hard and he went :58.2!!!

I'm actually rooting against him in the Blue Grass so I get a better price on Derby Day.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.