Place Vs. Fave/Long Exacta Running Tab

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

DAY SIX MARCH 14, 2007 Carryover PLACE BETTING +$388.20

Aqueduct: Race 6-- PL: 10.40 EX: 63.00

Gulfstream: Race 1-- PL: 5.80
Gulfstream: Race 3-- PL: 13.80
Gulfstream: Race 5-- PL: 22.60 + 27.40
Gulfstream: Race 6-- PL: 15.80
Gulfstream: Race 9-- PL: 11.80
Santa Anita: Race 2-- PL: 7.20 EX: 18.60
Santa Anita: Race 3-- PL: 11.00
Santa Anita: Race 6-- PL: 11.20 EX: 70.40 (Fave by a measly 100 bucks)



TOTALS SO FAR: EX- $392.40 PL $765.60
DIFFERENTIAL: PL +$373.20

Total Number of 10-1's or higher in spots 1 or 2: (48) Will Stop=250
Total Exactas so far: 13

Grits-don't spend that 15 bucks in one place today.

Total Races So Far--146

do you at least find it interesting that you hit 5 more bets than her today and she still won more money?

[Grits]

Randall, I think the 6th at Santa Anita is incorrect. The odds on the exacta were $3.10 on the fav. and $9.90 on the second place finisher.

Rules are rules, that's a tick short of a 10/1, that tick being 10 cents.

So, don't you think that $70+ needs to be removed? I do. No gimmees.

Or maybe I'm incorrect, so please check.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Grits

Randall, I think the 6th at Santa Anita is incorrect. The odds on the exacta were $3.10 on the fav. and $9.90 on the second place finisher.

Rules are rules, that's a tick short of a 10/1, that tick being 10 cents.

So, don't you think that $70+ needs to be removed? I do. No gimmees.

Or maybe I'm incorrect, so please check.

still 10-1 on the board... but u are right... randall - that means u kicked her ass again today!

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

still 10-1 on the board... but u are right... randall - that means u kicked her ass again today!

Nah, the horse would have been 9-1 on the board still.

A 10-1 horse on the board would never pay less than $22.00 even. This horse would have paid $21.80 and would have showed as 9-1 on the board.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Nah, the horse would have been 9-1 on the board still.

A 10-1 horse on the board would never pay less than $22.00 even. This horse would have paid $21.80 and would have showed as 9-1 on the board.

oh and they dont call you a child prodigy for nothing!

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

oh and they dont call you a child prodigy for nothing!

just think of it this way, the board will never click until the horse reaches at LEAST the number posted.

in NY, where they have twentieths of odds in their system, a horse that is $2.50-1 will show as 5-2 on the board. A horse that is $2.80-1 will still show as 5-2 as will a horse that is $2.95-1. Until the horse actually HITS 3-1, the horse won't be listed as such.

Imagine betting a horse at 3-1 on the board and only getting back $7.60. You'd be pissed

I did go to school as a math major ya know I just later became a bleeding heart liberal and felt I needed to read more immigrant literature!

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

just think of it this way, the board will never click until the horse reaches at LEAST the number posted.

in NY, where they have twentieths of odds in their system, a horse that is $2.50-1 will show as 5-2 on the board. A horse that is $2.80-1 will still show as 5-2 as will a horse that is $2.95-1. Until the horse actually HITS 3-1, the horse won't be listed as such.

Imagine betting a horse at 3-1 on the board and only getting back $7.60. You'd be pissed
I did go to school as a math major ya know I just later became a bleeding heart liberal and felt I needed to read more immigrant literature!

actually i'd be thrilled that i actually got money back!!!!!

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Grits

Randall, I think the 6th at Santa Anita is incorrect. The odds on the exacta were $3.10 on the fav. and $9.90 on the second place finisher.

Rules are rules, that's a tick short of a 10/1, that tick being 10 cents.

So, don't you think that $70+ needs to be removed? I do. No gimmees.

Or maybe I'm incorrect, so please check.

LOL, you are right, the problem was I checked the board at Youbet and not the win payoff. Youbet sucks, update the F ing board....Very honorable of you Grits--my admiration for you is growing by leaps and bounds....Give me 10 minutes and I'll fix it.

[Grits]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

LOL, you are right, the problem was I checked the board at Youbet and not the win payoff. Youbet sucks, update the F ing board....Very honorable of you Grits--my admiration for you is growing by leaps and bounds....Give me 10 minutes and I'll fix it.

Thank you Randall. Accuracy is good, it works for us all.

I read over Brisnet's results and charts. Those work for me.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Grits

Thank you Randall. Accuracy is good, it works for us all.

I read over Brisnet's results and charts. Those work for me.

Well I would obviously do the same if you were doing them...It's hard sometimes to keep it all straight but the easy thing to do is check the off odds at Youbet--always thought they were perfect on that, but maybe I'll pdf results from now on....Minor thing I guess....440 behind. Getting late early.

[Payson Dave]

Equibase.com provides free race charts in a pretty timely manner...usually within an hour of the completion of the race...pdf format that includes finish position and final odds of all runners in the race...may be helpful in this study.

[Payson Dave]

Another few races for the place wagers...

http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbP...&RACE=1&BorP=B

http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbP...&RACE=1&BorP=B

http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbP...&RACE=4&BorP=B