![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The also rans in the '06 edition also include Mark of Success, Music School (who was highly rated, but unjustifiably) Sharp Attack and King's Field. While the class of horses isn't the only determining factor, I think this is enough to show that it shouldn't be graded either. There are lots of races throughout the country that should lose their graded status at well.
__________________
Tod Marks Photo - Daybreak over Oklahoma |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
They can't all be graded, and from year to year many graded races have some real clunkers in there.
__________________
Alcohol, the cause and solution to all of life's problems. -Homer Simpson |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm sure that there are a lot of ungraded races that deserve the "upgrade" as well as many that should be downgraded, but in my mind, the recent increase in significance of Oaklawn park on the road to the Derby (which probably has as much to do with the slot money as Smarty Jones), I think it just makes too much sense for the Southwest/Rebel/Ark Derby, to be a Grade III/GII/GI progression. With the increase of big money/low "status" 2YO races (ie the Delta Jackpot) wrapping up Derby spots, it seems that more should be done to reward horses that run on the major Derby-prep circuits.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|