Pro Football Hall of Fame

[Samarta]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Came a little to close to Jerry Rice and he played on only one Super Bowl Championship team, but in two other Super Bowls. The one Super Bowl he did not play in was the only Super Bowl winning team he was on.

His stats look great. But Irvin got 3 Super Bowls. Apparently those go a heck of a long way with the voters. I would have put Monk in over Irvin. But I am prejudiced and hate the Cowboys as well as Irvin's lyng vices. Of course Michael Irvin has been saved about 3 or 4 times after his little coke induced sex flings. I guess Monk has not been saved enough times by popular Black pastors.

He played in 4 Super Bowls, won 3 (Miami, Denver, and Buffalo) lost 1 (Oakland).

[SniperSB23]

Real glad that Thurman got in. I thought Irvin's induction was expedited because he is an announcer and close to the voters. He was a great receiver and belongs in the HOF but shouldn't have got in before Art Monk and maybe even Andre Reed.

Career receiving yards:
Reed - 13198
Monk - 12721
Irvin - 11904

Career receptions:
Reed - 951
Monk - 940
Irvin - 750

Career receiving TDs:
Reed - 87
Monk - 68
Irvin - 65

Considering that Irvin's career started in 1988 as opposed to Reed in 1985 and Monk in 1980 and he started in a much more pass happy era I think that makes this difference even more staggering. I hate it when they reward the guys that had shorter careers and then enjoy success as a commentator rather than the guys who were great for a long time.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Real glad that Thurman got in. I thought Irvin's induction was expedited because he is an announcer and close to the voters. He was a great receiver and belongs in the HOF but shouldn't have got in before Art Monk and maybe even Andre Reed.

Career receiving yards:
Reed - 13198
Monk - 12721
Irvin - 11904

Career receptions:
Reed - 951
Monk - 940
Irvin - 750

Career receiving TDs:
Reed - 87
Monk - 68
Irvin - 65

Considering that Irvin's career started in 1988 as opposed to Reed in 1985 and Monk in 1980 and he started in a much more pass happy era I think that makes this difference even more staggering. I hate it when they reward the guys that had shorter careers and then enjoy success as a commentator rather than the guys who were great for a long time.

Great stats,Sniper! Media perception is usually skewed by the bright,shiny objects like trophies!

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Great stats,Sniper! Media perception is usually skewed by the bright,shiny objects like trophies!

Yeah, like Irvin would have had any of those trophies without that incredible offensive line. And I'm sure Andre Reed must have distracted Norwood on that field goal to make him miss so it is all his fault he didn't get a ring. The funny thing is Monk even has a ring and at the time of his retirement was the NFL's all time leading receiver and yet he still isn't in. Maybe someday the media will realize that sports are team games and individuals' abilities shouldn't be based solely on championships won. I doubt it though.

Originally Posted by Samarta

He played in 4 Super Bowls, won 3 (Miami, Denver, and Buffalo) lost 1 (Oakland).

I stand corrected. You are right. But he did not play against Miami. I believe he was injured.

Being on the Cowgirls helps. Look at the Probowl this year. Romo and Roy Williams... are you kidding me. Roy Williams hits hard and cant cover a bed and he gets in.

[ManilaRose]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Being on the Cowgirls helps. Look at the Probowl this year. Romo and Roy Williams... are you kidding me. Roy Williams hits hard and cant cover a bed and he gets in.

I'm a Cowboys fan and I agree with you 100% on Roy Williams. He's nothing more than an out of control safety who will crush 2 people a game(often on his own team) and get beat deep AT LEAST 1 or 2 times a game. As for Romo it is unusual he got in considering the # of games he played but I don't know anyone else in the NFC I'd put in there.