Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2007, 10:28 AM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

The three horses vanned off had nothing to do with the cancel then?

Did the three horses last night get vanned off because of high winds, or because it was too cold?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2007, 10:34 AM
dftwhbvxlcklop
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid
The three horses vanned off had nothing to do with the cancel then?

Did the three horses vanned off get vanned because of high winds or because it was too cold?
Not in my mind. But perhaps that played into the decions of others to vote to cancel the card for the weekend. Believe me, Turfway has a long way to go to make the surface better--but I strongly believe what they have now is better than dirt with all the problems they are experiencing. People make not like a synthetic surface, but the numbers are better than it was when there was dirt.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2007, 10:40 AM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

Tell that to the 18 guys who put horses down in the worst December on record. Tell that to the 3 guys who vanned off last night.

How about the guys at Woodbine? BRUTAL

How about my babies that breezed up there and came back to CDT limping around. Get real man, stop pimping that ****. Its far from being the surface you guys want it to be.

Ive heard a steady retraction.....instead of being a great surface, its "better than what they had" Listen, you could run them out on 71 and it would have been better than what they had. Its hardly held up to what it is supposed to be, not even close.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2007, 10:50 AM
dftwhbvxlcklop
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid
Tell that to the 18 guys who put horses down in the worst December on record. Tell that to the 3 guys who vanned off last night.

How about the guys at Woodbine? BRUTAL

How about my babies that breezed up there and came back to CDT limping around. Get real man, stop pimping that ****. Its far from being the surface you guys want it to be.

Ive heard a steady retraction.....instead of being a great surface, its "better than what they had" Listen, you could run them out on 71 and it would have been better than what they had. Its hardly held up to what it is supposed to be, not even close.
Well I am one who have had 2 break down on the surface. And I have spoken to the ones that have had ones breakdown too. I hear your frustration and I hear theirs and mine. But again, compared to the dirt Turfway did have, Poly is better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2007, 10:57 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

but is poly better than a good dirt surface?

depends on who you ask.

i really think the tracks with turf went to poly so they would keep full fields, and not lose handle. how much of the increased handle is because turfers didn't scratch at those tracks when it was wet????
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:11 AM
dftwhbvxlcklop
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig188
but is poly better than a good dirt surface?

depends on who you ask.

i really think the tracks with turf went to poly so they would keep full fields, and not lose handle. how much of the increased handle is because turfers didn't scratch at those tracks when it was wet????
No I do not believe Poly is better than a good dirt track. But there is nothing wrong in trying something different. Turfway had 20 plus years to perfect the dirt surface and they couldnt. Why not give Poly 20 years????
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:21 AM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

If you want to try something different sell hotdogs for a buck
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:26 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1 dollar pick 3
No I do not believe Poly is better than a good dirt track. But there is nothing wrong in trying something different. Turfway had 20 plus years to perfect the dirt surface and they couldnt. Why not give Poly 20 years????
dirts been tried and true for how many years now? if dirt won't work in winter weather, they shouldn't have winter racing there. poly certainly hasn't stood up to the strain of the cold. sure hasn't made things warmer, or the weather milder.
i can see keeneland making the switch, it assures full fields when turf isn't usable.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:04 AM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

Polytrack has never been about the horses. If it were about the horses they would have tested it extensively before installing it. That track was never tested in extreme cold, it was never tested period. Just because it handles some rain in England, doesnt make it "all weather" Of course as soon as Keeneland got involved it had credibility. Before that there were a lot of questions, but with an industry leader involved it was the greatest thing ever.

Any buffoon can see that track hasnt lived up to expectations. Whether you are pro poly, or anti poly, or really dont give a rats ass, you can tell the track isnt as advertised.

They need to address the issues instead of doing a song and dance. Its cold in Kentucky in February, apparnelty too cold to run through the weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:08 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid
Polytrack has never been about the horses. If it were about the horses they would have tested it extensively before installing it. That track was never tested in extreme cold, it was never tested period. Just because it handles some rain in England, doesnt make it "all weather" Of course as soon as Keeneland got involved it had credibility. Before that there were a lot of questions, but with an industry leader involved it was the greatest thing ever.

Any buffoon can see that track hasnt lived up to expectations. Whether you are pro poly, or anti poly, or really dont give a rats ass, you can tell the track isnt as advertised.

They need to address the issues instead of doing a song and dance. Its cold in Kentucky in February, apparnelty too cold to run through the weekend.
i am, and have been, anti poly. don't see a valid reason to change my mind at this time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.