Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2019, 04:45 PM
Merlinsky Merlinsky is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard burch View Post
If we disregard tradition, what is the negative about letting horses start to race at 3 instead of 2?
Scientific studies point to racing at 2 being better for soundness. If you responsibly exert stress on the bones of a 2yo, their skeletal system will ultimately be stronger for the weight that's likely to come as they grow. Now obviously you can't over-train/race them or that'll do more harm than good, but if they go without that stress, you can end up with a frame that's possibly under-prepared to handle the weight of a maturing horse. If the 2yo is already massive and gangly, there'd be some adjustment to the idea of responsible stressing of the bones because you're already dealing with a lot of weight on an immature frame.

People get emotional about the idea of protecting the poor babies, but it's not based on fact, just feeling. Surely they'd be better off waiting, etc. Not really. If you want a safer situation for horses, bone strength matters and you're more likely to get that racing at 2.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2019, 05:16 PM
richard burch's Avatar
richard burch richard burch is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlinsky View Post
Scientific studies point to racing at 2 being better for soundness. If you responsibly exert stress on the bones of a 2yo, their skeletal system will ultimately be stronger for the weight that's likely to come as they grow. Now obviously you can't over-train/race them or that'll do more harm than good, but if they go without that stress, you can end up with a frame that's possibly under-prepared to handle the weight of a maturing horse. If the 2yo is already massive and gangly, there'd be some adjustment to the idea of responsible stressing of the bones because you're already dealing with a lot of weight on an immature frame.

People get emotional about the idea of protecting the poor babies, but it's not based on fact, just feeling. Surely they'd be better off waiting, etc. Not really. If you want a safer situation for horses, bone strength matters and you're more likely to get that racing at 2.
Sounds reasonable. I think that a full year of training from 2 to 3 rather than racing maybe the better option, less stress and less green when they begin to race at 3. They would be stronger, more developed. mature and more prepared.
__________________
Support your local Re-run or horse rescue organization.
https://www.rerunottb.com/:)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.