Saddam Hung

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

I don't know how anyone would want to see that... sicko.

Cajun,
When I first saw the title of this thread, "Saddam Hung", I expected that it would be a "tell all" from one of his previous mistresses. Hanged would be a better term.
Yes, "sickos" get some joy from this. Heck, I never liked the guy myself.
That said, there's more to come.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world...nal-iraq1.html

Now, let's put the real war criminals on trial.
Who cares what their mistresses claim?

[KirisClown]

Here's a video of him dropping through the floor after being strung up...

http://pandachute.com/videos/leaked_...ing_hung_video

[Scav]

Kiris, THANK YOU..I have been eagerly awaiting this since it was reported.

[Cajungator26]

Originally Posted by Scav

Kiris, THANK YOU..I have been eagerly awaiting this since it was reported.

WHY, Tom? I'm trying to understand how anyone can get joy out of watching another human's death... please explain.

[31lengths]

http://www.drudgereport.com/

[Scav]

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

WHY, Tom? I'm trying to understand how anyone can get joy out of watching another human's death... please explain.

So you are defending a person that made kids watch autopsy's on their parents and hung people becuase they didn't 'agree' with him?

Fact is that he got off easy with the hanging. They should have ripped the jerkoff one limb at a time

[Cajungator26]

Originally Posted by Scav

So you are defending a person that made kids watch autopsy's on their parents and hung people becuase they didn't 'agree' with him?

Fact is that he got off easy with the hanging. They should have ripped the jerkoff one limb at a time

Who said I was defending the guy? He was a scumbag. You still didn't answer the question as to WHY you enjoy watching that kind of stuff.

[Scav]

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

Who said I was defending the guy? He was a scumbag. You still didn't answer the question as to WHY you enjoy watching that kind of stuff.

Because I like seeing people get what they deserve, and as I argued with Kev last night, I see things for myself so I can have my own opinion on them. NO HEARSAY HERE

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Yeah I agree. Lets not forget the guy tried to have his son killed, and killed I think 2 of his son in laws. Not to mention the other 100,000's of thousands of people he was directly responsible for killing. I hear it's not the person, it's the system but sorry not this time. Evil to the very end. He got off easy.

Well, said son was not exactly a stand-up guy, either. Saddam put a death sentence on him because the son beat his personal food-taster to death in front of a house full of party guests. Then let him off the hook, because, after all, it was just a food taster.

The New York Times' obit on Saddam (Saturday's) was pretty darn good-- reminding one of all the atrocities for which he's responsible, along with how his big tactical error in attacking Iran (which led us to financially support him for a while) led to the invasion of Kuwait. I learned a lot.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/29/wo...addamobit.html

[lg1965]

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

WHY, Tom? I'm trying to understand how anyone can get joy out of watching another human's death... please explain.

back in 1793 and 1794, parisians would go to mass, then go get wine and cheese and sit around the village square as the guillotin provided them with hours of ongoing entertainment. the children would run through the fields and play tag, grandma would knit, and father would discuss business (yes, even on the sabbath) with other merchants, all as the new "citizen's government" leveled off the shoulders of louis xiv's family and friends. that kind of stuff has been a big seller for years.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

back in 1793 and 1794, parisians would go to mass, then go get wine and cheese and sit around the village square as the guillotin provided them with hours of ongoing entertainment. the children would run through the fields and play tag, grandma would knit, and father would discuss business (yes, even on the sabbath) with other merchants, all as the new "citizen's government" leveled off the shoulders of louis xiv's family and friends. that kind of stuff has been a big seller for years.

Whoever said the French were civilized??

[KirisClown]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

back in 1793 and 1794, parisians would go to mass, then go get wine and cheese and sit around the village square as the guillotin provided them with hours of ongoing entertainment. the children would run through the fields and play tag, grandma would knit, and father would discuss business (yes, even on the sabbath) with other merchants, all as the new "citizen's government" leveled off the shoulders of louis xiv's family and friends. that kind of stuff has been a big seller for years.

They'd never execute the Sun King....

Louis XVI is a different story though...

I always liked the fact that dogs etc would hang around underneath the platform, then lick up some of the blood afterwards, must have been a wild scene...

[lg1965]

i always get my iv's and vi's confused. i'm the one that started the thread "seahawks will win superbowl LX" and was told i'll have to wait 20 years.

[lg1965]

Originally Posted by KirisClown

Here's a video of him dropping through the floor after being strung up...

http://pandachute.com/videos/leaked_...ing_hung_video

if anyone was gonna come through, it was you.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Cajun,
When I first saw the title of this thread, "Saddam Hung", I expected that it would be a "tell all" from one of his previous mistresses. Hanged would be a better term.
Yes, "sickos" get some joy from this. Heck, I never liked the guy myself.
That said, there's more to come.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world...nal-iraq1.html

Now, let's put the real war criminals on trial.
Who cares what their mistresses claim?

saddam wasn't a real war criminal? or are you suggesting that his crimes pale in comparison to others more deserving of that title?

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Danzig188

saddam wasn't a real war criminal? or are you suggesting that his crimes pale in comparison to others more deserving of that title?

Danzig,
Of course Saddam was a war criminal. I agree that he was.
Also, from reports that I've read from various news sources today, the world opinion is split. One more corpse added to the heap will not solve this situation.
Go back on this thread and read my post #10. Get back later.
DTS

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Danzig,
Of course Saddam was a war criminal. I agree that he was.
Also, from reports that I've read from various news sources today, the world opinion is split. One more corpse added to the heap will not solve this situation.
Go back on this thread and read my post #10. Get back later.
DTS

In my opinion, if you think that the US is the big evil, get the hell out of America and go live in the middle east.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

In my opinion, if you think that the US is the big evil, get the hell out of America and go live in the middle east.

Not to be a jerk -- but that's a really bad attitude to have. Nobody, at least as far as i can tell, is trying to insinuate that the U.S. is the "big evil" here. They're just saying that the whole Saddam spectacle did nobody any good. Not a single person benefits from the disgusting way he was "executed" (if you can even use such a dignified term, when it was more accurately lynching or retaliatory joy killing).

I really hate the "if you don't like it, leave" argument -- because it cuts directly past the core of our country...that we're blessed with the right to not only dislike it, but absolutely HATE it at times....and it's still ours and we're still allowed to be a part of it. It's sort of counterintuitive to use that argument because it denies the very core of American values.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Not to be a jerk -- but that's a really bad attitude to have. Nobody, at least as far as i can tell, is trying to insinuate that the U.S. is the "big evil" here. They're just saying that the whole Saddam spectacle did nobody any good. Not a single person benefits from the disgusting way he was "executed" (if you can even use such a dignified term, when it was more accurately lynching or retaliatory joy killing).

I really hate the "if you don't like it, leave" argument -- because it cuts directly past the core of our country...that we're blessed with the right to not only dislike it, but absolutely HATE it at times....and it's still ours and we're still allowed to be a part of it. It's sort of counterintuitive to use that argument because it denies the very core of American values.

You make some valid points about the core of out country, but I think that people should have some patriotism. I mean, terrorists have claimed war against the US, and all some people do over here while they live comfortably and without the fear of being bombed at the super-market, is bash the government and military actions.

While, using hindsight, invading Iraq has been a big problem for our country and was probably not the right move to do (especially that WMD crap), I will always back my government and military for trying to protect us US citizens. And I honestly believe that they (as in the govnt) made the decision to invade Iraq to protect us. I really dont give all the conspiricy theorist's a minute of my time.

There has not been a terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11, and that is not from lack of trying by the terrorists. It is because of the actions of our government and military.

I really feel upset when people bash our military and it's leaders when they are trying to end terrorism, maybe not in the correct way, but the terrorists are so very dangerous action needed to be taken and it was.

Believe me, I dont like Bush... being a gay woman who works in the gambling industry, I think Bush has a very closed minded views on social issues and it upsets me. But I am all for being and feeling safe where I live, even if I cant get married!

But hey, this is my opinion and everyone is entitled to one, I just feel uneasy when people dont support the war on terror.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

You make some valid points about the core of out country, but I think that people should have some patriotism. I mean, terrorists have claimed war against the US, and all some people do over here while they live comfortably and without the fear of being bombed at the super-market, is bash the government and military actions.

While, using hindsight, invading Iraq has been a big problem for our country and was probably not the right move to do (especially that WMD crap), I will always back my government and military for trying to protect us US citizens. And I honestly believe that they (as in the govnt) made the decision to invade Iraq to protect us. I really dont give all the conspiricy theorist's a minute of my time.

There has not been a terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11, and that is not from lack of trying by the terrorists. It is because of the actions of our government and military.

I really feel upset when people bash our military and it's leaders when they are trying to end terrorism, maybe not in the correct way, but the terrorists are so very dangerous action needed to be taken and it was.

Believe me, I dont like Bush... being a gay woman who works in the gambling industry, I think Bush has a very closed minded views on social issues and it upsets me. But I am all for being and feeling safe where I live, even if I cant get married!

But hey, this is my opinion and everyone is entitled to one, I just feel uneasy when people dont support the war on terror.

Wow,
That confession is too good to pass. I'm not a priest, though I play one at times.
Say five our fathers and bathe in holy water, and keep believing that Bush and his buddies are keeping you safe, afterall, the war on terror is all about Iraq, right?
Good luck!!!