Now you PC Dogooders can attack Beyer

[SCUDSBROTHER]

"I feel bad for your dogs."

Pity based on a false premise.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

"I wonder if Andy Beyer (or anyone else) wants to change their opinion on the DQ after seeing Scuds performance. I know I would."


Combining a false premise with guilt by association.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

"I guess anything to NOT have an intelligent conversation about what actually happened in the Derby."


That's yet another false premise (used to try to produce guilt, or to gain some sort of moral high ground.)


We had that conversation. We disagreed. God forbid. So, you are bringing out all sorts of logical fallacies (ad hominems, mainly) because I said something about one of your many favorite protected pets in the industry, I suppose. You like to attach yourself to those that you appear to think are better than yourself, and better than most "others." Bouncer for your horsey stars, I guess.
Very Corey Lewandowski-ish.

[Dahoss]

I was wondering how this lunatic would twist the fact he’s dead wrong about this pick 3 nonsense since I wasn’t even a member here in 2005.

I got my answer.

[Dahoss]

I can’t wait for Scuds next post. Each one is better than the next

[moses]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I was wondering how this lunatic would twist the fact he’s dead wrong about this pick 3 nonsense since I wasn’t even a member here in 2005.

I got my answer.

I don’t want to add to the conspiracy theory but Steve’s account says he joined in 2006, but the website was create a few years prior to that, so there may be a glitch concerning the join date. Or maybe it was the yahoo group (which I don’t think I ever posted on). Or possibly...Scuds is just way off on this. Just maybe.

Regardless of all of that, this alleged situation happened 14 years ago. I thought my wife was bad at not letting stuff go but she’s got nothing on Scuds. For the record, if my wife asks, I never said that.

While I’m at it, I take issue with the constant reference to sadism. If anything, we are masochists since we continue to bet on horse racing despite the many, many letdowns that we’ve all experienced.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by moses

I don’t want to add to the conspiracy theory but Steve’s account says he joined in 2006, but the website was create a few years prior to that, so there may be a glitch concerning the join date. Or maybe it was the yahoo group (which I don’t think I ever posted on). Or possibly...Scuds is just way off on this. Just maybe.

Regardless of all of that, this alleged situation happened 14 years ago. I thought my wife was bad at not letting stuff go but she’s got nothing on Scuds. For the record, if my wife asks, I never said that.

While I’m at it, I take issue with the constant reference to sadism. If anything, we are masochists since we continue to bet on horse racing despite the many, many letdowns that we’ve all experienced.

He’s way off on this like everything else. Regardless, for him to think I’m bitter about him hitting a pick 3 and me missing it 14 years ago is batshit crazy. Just like these threads.

Am I bitter at Rudeboyelvis too? Did he hit a pick 3 a dozen years ago too?

And yeah....we’re masochists if anything.

[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by moses

I thought my wife was bad at not letting stuff go but she’s got nothing on Scuds. For the record, if my wife asks, I never said that.

Thanks for the laugh!

[Dawgswin]

It seems a reasonable question to ask, “Why are you so angry?” It’s not exactly clear to me WHO you are angry with either.