![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
wouldnt you shake the reigns or show him the whip if he was doing that. He could have been 4 clear if he wanted, he was so over confident when he was only a little bit ahead...guess we will see if he is on him next time.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Probably will see Smith, or Espinoza on next |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see we've reached "jockeys are all devious crooks" hour. Must've been a bad day.
Garcia was overconfident and he won't be on the horse next time. He also amazingly didn't see a horse closing from 15 lengths behind up the rail. It was a great ride by Kent on a nice runner to beat him by a nose. And the horse did him no favors when he stopped to a gallop suddenly. I have a hard time believing Baffert or Coolmore is as apoplectic about it as the internet is. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Clearly the jockey MOVED the horse over. You can see it plain as day.
If I was a steward, I'd give him a six month suspension. I have no patience for that kind of riding. The people that bet that horse got screwed though. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
how about protecting the betting public? Dude should at least get 7 for that ride, cant have that happen, not with the shape this sport is in.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm all for that. Just stop with the tinfoil hat stuff.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is tinfoil about it? There's no question that in other jurisdictions both Irad and Garcia would absolutely have the book thrown at them and then some. With the example of Irad, if he can do something like that 10 times and maybe get DQ'ed once with no or a small suspension, you can damn well bet he's going to continue riding that way.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Under the guise of "did it cost a horse a placing" has allowed for a lot of latitude by the riders since the stewards dont dq a horse unless that standard has been met. I would prefer there still be a stiff penalty even if a horse is not dq'd. In terms of hearding, I am fine with it as long as two things do not happen, you do not take the other horse off the path they are on and you dont bump them. I would also be a fan of a "foul is a foul" dq...this would clean things up right quick. careless riding can get people hurt. I made a post about another rider I thought was dangerous in socal, so this isnt some kind of vendetta.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|