|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
12-20-2006, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
i put him in there since he hasn't backed up his breathtaking performance in the bluegrass. probably not as similar to the others as they are to each other, but hey, one has to win--i assume he would be the one!
i know some accuse a front runner of theft when they 'steal' a race on the front end, much like the tin man in the arlington million. but imo a confirmed stone closer is as much a thief, as he is there to pick up all the pieces at the very end but only if the pace is right on and they manage to stay clean and clear.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln 
|
|
#2
12-20-2006, 04:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes I would agree with front runners taking too much criticism when they win races like the Tin Man did. Sinister Minister would have beaten any horse alive that day. To be fair he only had 2 chances to back up his big Blue Grass win and one of them was the Derby. He went fast as expected and faced pressure. Total throwout of a race in my opinion.
Do I think he is as good as his Blue Grass? No way. But I would rank him a lot higher than those other 3 plodders you mentioned. Hopefully the Minister gets back in a race soon and another chance to validate who he is or isnt.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
