![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Take for example NY State Presidential Election Results: Hillary Clinton Democrat 4,143,874 58.8% Donald J. Trump Republican 2,640,570 37.5 Gary Johnson Libertarian 161,836 2.3 Jill Stein Green 99,895 1.4 The polls closed at 9:00pm, and by 9:01pm the had already called the state for Clinton. Question - how many Republicans, knowing that their votes would have no impact, did not bother to vote? Important to note that statewide, there are approx 11,500,000 active, registered voters. Now, hypothetically, assume that they notified Republicans well in advance that this would be contested by Popular vote, then how many would have stayed home, now knowing their voices would actually be heard? It is asinine to assume that the margin in victory is static. Yet, the MSM continues to drone on about it rather than report the facts. Between California, New York, and Illinois alone, it is safe to assume numbers approaching 1 million Republicans didn't bother to vote because under the current electoral system and the state in which they reside, they know full well going in that their vote is meaningless. In my opinion, were if the election were contested differently, Trump would have clearly won both the popular vote. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note from Canada: Mexico is open
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
More compassion for the "Love Trumps Hate" howling horde:
![]() Apparently they actually don't give a sh.it who's "children are watching" Funny thing - no one was fooled. We know them better than they know themselves. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Daily hypocrisy reminder:
"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a danger to our Democracy" ~ Hillary Rodham Clinton (2 weeks ago). |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|