![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Personally, until I see real data, I can't get a handle on what lower minimums have done to payouts. I do know that it allows sophisticated bettors additional opportunities at more coverage, and does invite people who otherwise would not to get into the pools. The tax ramifications are also positive, so there's plenty to like. If you isolate Derby weekend, the super goes to a $1 minimum, and I find it almost unplayable at that price point. That's just a personal opinion, which I think most of these are until someone produces actual research. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Surely there are some former triple bettors out there... I get the tax thing, but the triple at haff a buck makes it unplayable. When you hit one, you gotta get paid,and you don't anymore. Dime supers are a joke .wouldnt haff a buck there be a happy medium ? At least the pick 3 being a buck makes it ok to play. Make the double a deuce like the real,old days. A $5 min exacta one race a day would be awesome too in the last race
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
They aren't maximums....they're minimums.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Enough with all this minimum talk, when is the late Pick 5 coming to the rest of the NYRA calendar?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|