![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keeneland already has it don't they?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really hope they keep this bet at Belmont. I am surprised they waited this long to do it, I doubt highly it will cannibalize the pk6 or pk4.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think they would only have a late pk5 on cards of 10 or more races. I don't think they would want to overlap the last leg of the early pk5 with the first leg of the late pk5.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not ? What's the diff ? Isn't the pick 4 part of the pick 5 in Cali ?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
No
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
When they run 8 , how do they do it ?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes,(starting with race 2)with the exception of DMR..........and DMR is costing themselves handle by not adding an early P-4 to the wagering menu.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tracks go with .50 Min's on P-3/4's because that's what the public wants.......as a result of the lower min's the handle on the Multi's goes up......so that's good for the track also.
It's a tax break for the player also if the payoff stays under $600 via a .50 score{no IRS window visit}. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|