|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
08-02-2016, 08:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone explain the difference here?
 
|
|
#3
08-02-2016, 09:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Khizr Khan makes a living out of bringing Muslims into this country. He literally profits from selling US access and citizenship. So it goes without saying that he opposes Trumps immigration reform.
This whole charade is nothing more than a despicable publicity stunt whereby he tosses his dead son around to pick a fight with Trump. Disgusting. Trump needs to be more savvy when dealing with these creeps. Cindi Sheehan was protesting a war that killed her son; Khan is using his son's death to promote more unfettered muslim migration. Enormous Difference.
|
|
#4
08-02-2016, 09:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
He's a Bush/Clinton socialite.
Bottom line. Americans love getting conned. The schools, media, etc have done a number on people. It's all about emotion, shame, and co-existing. Never mind the fact that if it was a white man on stage with his wife in hair rollers the hypocritical liberal media and its sheep would be in an uproar. Dumbest people on the planet...THE DHIMMICRATS.
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016
|
|
#5
08-02-2016, 10:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Khan’s speech got a writeup on the front page of the New York Times. He's been on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” CNN’s “State of the Union,” NBC's “Today” show, MSNBC's “Morning Joe,” ABC's "This Week" and CNN's “New Day.” Pat Smith by my count has been interviewed on national tv once following her speech at the republican convention. No difference.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
