facepalm of the day

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Fyi when addressing a post is an insult so STFU with playing the victim bullshit.

Said the guy who just did so by discussing someone trying to abuse them, as tho it gave you a moral high ground, as tho you had a right to an opinion, while assuming someone who had a different pov just didnt get it?

You take care, jms. I have no idea whar is going on with you right now. I know we had a lot of great convos here. But i guess that time has past.

[Crown@club]

"This is your brain on drugs"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0a372181a44a0

[GenuineRisk]

Whoa. That escalated quickly.

JMS I'm so sorry you were sexually threatened when you were young, and Danzig I'm so sorry you were molested by a relative. Abuse against kids is one of the things that makes me wish I believed in hell.

Allowing transgender men and women into the bathroom that most closely correlates with how they identify isn't going to lead to an increase in violence against children. Men (because let's be honest, most sexual predators are men) aren't going to pose as transgender to get into a bathroom to assault a child or woman; if they see a woman or child enter a bathroom alone they'll seize the opportunity because she's alone, and the fact that there's a drawing of a woman on the door isn't going to stop them. I mean, what, a man is going to walk into a woman's rest room with five or six women in there, start to assault a woman and the other women in there are just going to stand around and say, "Oh, well, this person said they were transgender so it's okay"? Come on.

Truth is, transgender men and women are far more likely to be the victims of violence that the perpetrators.

I have an acquaintance who is female-to-male transgender, and believe me, if he walked into a women's rest room the women would scream and shout at him to get out. Because he looks male. He has a full beard, for chrissakes. And people are going to say he should be using the women's room because of anatomy that no one is going to see because he's going to use a stall? Come on.

The fear-mongering that is going on about this, as this article points out, is woefully short of any images of actual transgender people.

http://www.attn.com/stories/4080/tra...bathroom-panic

Ultimately, unisex restrooms would probably be best, since there's no evidence that gendered restrooms protect women any better than unisex ones do (again, a sexual predator is not going to be deterred by a sign on the door if a woman is in there alone), but I think Bible thumpers would freak out about that, too.

[saratogadew]

I think it's very sexist to make women use a separate bathroom. We treat them like second class citizens. If women only knew that the Men's bathroom had 3 ply toilet paper while they had to wrestle with 2 ply, there would be outrage. Maybe there should just be one bathroom that said "Humans" on the door. That would make everyone happy. Oh wait, except those that self identify as aliens.

[OldDog]

Another violent tea partier!

http://www.wdef.com/2016/03/28/man-w...hot-by-police/

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by saratogadew

I think it's very sexist to make women use a separate bathroom. We treat them like second class citizens. If women only knew that the Men's bathroom had 3 ply toilet paper while they had to wrestle with 2 ply, there would be outrage. Maybe there should just be one bathroom that said "Humans" on the door. That would make everyone happy. Oh wait, except those that self identify as aliens.

We don't care about the plys on the paper; it's the gold-plated bidets we envy. We know they're in there; we can see the gleam shining from within.

Bidets for all!

[Danzig]

Wtf Michigan?!

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/29/us/det...ery/index.html

Since the EPA is not involved, I guess they felt ok going out on a limb for Detroit students?

[OldDog]

White House Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism’

http://mrctv.org/blog/video-wh-censo...ench-president

[Danzig]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...mepage%2Fstory

[jms62]

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...0160418?page=3

[jms62]

I guess high level government officials instructing banks to dump toxic assets on a company, providing a loan to the company (along with others) and when said company turns it around changing terms from paying the loan from profits to give me all your profits while some of these government officials go to work for banks that dumped the toxic assets is not as important as keeping up with the Kardashians or which restroom someone can or cannot use.

[Rileyoriley]

Originally Posted by jms62

I guess high level government officials instructing banks to dump toxic assets on a company, providing a loan to the company (along with others) and when said company turns it around changing terms from paying the loan from profits to give me all your profits while some of these government officials go to work for banks that dumped the toxic assets is not as important as keeping up with the Kardashians or which restroom someone can or cannot use.

Are you surprised?

[Crown@club]

Originally Posted by jms62

I guess high level government officials instructing banks to dump toxic assets on a company, providing a loan to the company (along with others) and when said company turns it around changing terms from paying the loan from profits to give me all your profits while some of these government officials go to work for banks that dumped the toxic assets is not as important as keeping up with the Kardashians or which restroom someone can or cannot use.

And this surprises you?

[Danzig]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...rple_haze.html

[OldDog]