Black Monday

[declansharbor]

Originally Posted by saratogadew

Correct. He is a mediocre back up at best.

Then who would you go after? This oughtta be funny.



Mediocre back up at best?!? Pull your head out of your a$$. He'd EASILY be the best back up in football, if that's where he lands. He won't, however, because he's better than that. Between the deluge of dropped passes, and the amount of time the porous O Line gave him for most of the year, I think he did a good job this year (not the year that the fans expected after a dynamite preseason, but still a good year that easily could have been much better).

[saratogadew]

Originally Posted by declansharbor

Then who would you go after? This oughtta be funny.



Mediocre back up at best?!? Pull your head out of your a$$. He'd EASILY be the best back up in football, if that's where he lands. He won't, however, because he's better than that. Between the deluge of dropped passes, and the amount of time the porous O Line gave him for most of the year, I think he did a good job this year (not the year that the fans expected after a dynamite preseason, but still a good year that easily could have been much better).

I would keep him and go for a QB in the draft. The Eagles have so many holes that even Brady wouldn't succeed. Bradford is an immobile, dink and dunk quarterback. Defences can play up and tee off on him because he can't stretch the field. Any negative stat on Bradford can easily be deflected to the O line and recievers. If you're looking for a 9-7, 10-6 QB, he might fit the bill. But if you're looking to go deep into the playoffs, or god forbid, the Superbowl, Bradford will not, and can't get you there. This is besides the fact that he can't make it through a full season because of his fragility.