![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is the final article which includes some interesting, and pretty much previously undiscussed, information about NYRA's purchasing of the properties.
http://www.drf.com/news/article/81245.html |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The franchise extension in 1983 had a provision that stated the land would be ceded to the state if NYRA ceased to run the franchise, and I have stated earlier this is the legal claim the state has on the land and very much the issue to be ruled on, but there is a substantial argument against the legality of this provision.
That same language was also NOT in the franchise extension from 1997. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's the million dollar question. You can get a number of different opinions on this depending on who you ask. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am enjoying it. Personal feelings aside, it's pretty entertaining stuff, and ideally some good should come out of it ( perhaps not realistically ). I think some very interesting developments await us. Regardless of how one feels I have to believe it's good to see NYRA finally go on the offensive. Personally I have felt they have stayed reasonably quiet for too long. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|