How Is Obamacare Working Out for You?

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I hate to think the bills the parents of the little boy that ended up with a heart transplant. And hed lived in children's for months before the transplant. I'll never forget how excited everyone was when he got his heart...and for the first time in forever, actually had color in his face. God, that poor baby. His name was Jude....and that's the name of the patron saint of lost causes.

My friend who had a double lung transplant said her bills are in the seven figure range. She'll never pay them all off. All because she had the same condition her dad had (who died in from it in the 1980s, just as they were starting to succeed with transplants. What huge strides medicine has made in 30 years!).

[GenuineRisk]

For those with previously undiagnosed diabetes, the ACA is working out very well:

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/con....full.pdf+html

The TL: DR summary is that for states that expanded Medicaid via the ACA, there has been a big increase in diagnosis of early stage diabetes, and in those states that have not, there has not. To quote our VP, that's a big f*cking deal, because the earlier diabetes can be identified and addressed, the cheaper the care is. Amputation, kidney dialysis and seeing-eye dogs are hella expensive.

I look forward to Ted Cruz running on "Obamacare gives people diabetes!"

[Danzig]

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...r-satisfaction

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Danzig

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...r-satisfaction

That is hilarious that the author doesn't mention all the people whose premiums have skyrocketed and whose doctors will not take their insurance. The author says that none of the predictions of the Republicans came true. Many of the most important predictions came true. They said that with the ACA you would not be able to keep your plan, you would not be able to see your doctor, and your premium would skyrocket. That is exactly what happened to me and to millions of others.

If a guy is going to write a fair article about the ACA, how could he fail to mention that? If I was going to write an honest article, I would have to mention both the good and the bad. For example, even though I hate the ACA I know that it is good for some people. It will help people with pre-existing conditions.

How can this author not mention the bad parts of the ACA? That is simply a dishonest article.

[dellinger63]

Contrary to goals, ER visits rise under Obamacare

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-act/26625571/

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

That is hilarious that the author doesn't mention all the people whose premiums have skyrocketed and whose doctors will not take their insurance. The author says that none of the predictions of the Republicans came true. Many of the most important predictions came true. They said that with the ACA you would not be able to keep your plan, you would not be able to see your doctor, and your premium would skyrocket. That is exactly what happened to me and to millions of others.

If a guy is going to write a fair article about the ACA, how could he fail to mention that? If I was going to write an honest article, I would have to mention both the good and the bad. For example, even though I hate the ACA I know that it is good for some people. It will help people with pre-existing conditions.

How can this author not mention the bad parts of the ACA? That is simply a dishonest article.

I know - one would think being the producer for The Rachel Maddow Show he would be more fair and balanced

[GenuineRisk]

Interesting piece on a guy who chose not to get coverage under the Affordable Care Act, had something bad happen, and now, because the deadline has passed, can't get coverage.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e20696283.html

He made choices, they were the wrong ones, and he's still blaming Obama for it. It would be funny if his situation weren't so sad.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Interesting piece on a guy who chose not to get coverage under the Affordable Care Act, had something bad happen, and now, because the deadline has passed, can't get coverage.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e20696283.html

He made choices, they were the wrong ones, and he's still blaming Obama for it. It would be funny if his situation weren't so sad.

that same thing happens every day, with every type of insurance. it's mindboggling.
a few years back when sandy hit the northeast, a woman was complaining on tv, online, all over....she had a homeowners policy, but of course it doesn't cover flood.
they had a flood policy, but they cancelled because they'd paid more over the years for it, than they'd gotten any back (an odd way to view insurance, it's not an investment). so, she had no house any more cause it got washed away--um, you're an idiot. and it wasn't allstates fault you're an idiot
people bad mouth insurance til the sun goes down. til they need it. they think it's a waste of money, til they need it.

i really hope we get single payer soon...i'm tired of the current state of affairs. the old system was unworkable and broken, so is the new one.
put everyone on medicare, today. that gets rid of medicaid and all associated issues/red tape, etc.
no more health care thru employers, no more yearly enrollments, no irs involved, none of that. health insurance companies can sell supplements to whoever wants it/needs it like they do now for medicare patients. blam, done.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Interesting piece on a guy who chose not to get coverage under the Affordable Care Act, had something bad happen, and now, because the deadline has passed, can't get coverage.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e20696283.html

He made choices, they were the wrong ones, and he's still blaming Obama for it. It would be funny if his situation weren't so sad.

This douche bag has a $300K house. Hello!!!

He has no one to blame but himself for neglecting his own health. (Love the pack of Marlboro's in his pocket)

Maybe he could go out, sell some crack, and get arrested while he can still see. Ironic as it is, as a prisoner he's 'entitled' to healthcare.

A man who won't apply for social security disability because it takes too long is either a lazy fool or has something to hide, like not paying taxes on his income.

Something about this story stinks, and stinks bad but for the sake of presenting a pro-Obamacare/anti-republican stance the author and or editor choose to pinch their noses and leave the turds where they lay.