Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Pages 20 - 24 if interested in seeing this

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...3hr4681eas.pdf

The term ‘‘congressional intelligence commit5
tees’’ means—


there's joke material for you.


back to the original post tho...i went to cnn dot com, msnbc, and yahoo politics front pages. nothing on this. yahoo has an article that discusses things in the spending bill, but this isn't one of the things mentioned. same at ny times, wash. post. huffpo has 5 big things article...not there either.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-s...b_6307852.html

i think i'll take the dog for a walk.

[jms62]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...774-Pages-Long

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

The term ‘‘congressional intelligence commit5
tees’’ means—


there's joke material for you.


back to the original post tho...i went to cnn dot com, msnbc, and yahoo politics front pages. nothing on this. yahoo has an article that discusses things in the spending bill, but this isn't one of the things mentioned. same at ny times, wash. post. huffpo has 5 big things article...not there either.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-s...b_6307852.html

i think i'll take the dog for a walk.

I particularly love the repetitive use of the phrase "*nonpublic* communications."

Maybe because *nonpublic* is sooo much less....I dunno..... personal?.. than just sayin' "*private* communications?"

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

I particularly love the repetitive use of the phrase "*nonpublic* communications."

Maybe because *nonpublic* is sooo much less....I dunno..... personal?.. than just sayin' "*private* communications?"

it's like saying 'revenue enhancement' instead of taxes. pol-speak, a whole different language.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Justin Amash to Boehner: Buh Bye

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapi...des_to_vo.html