Litf

Originally Posted by Danzig188

you'd think an outstanding handicapper such as yourself would want him to keep running--that way you could get a better price on your winners.

lol oh, wait. there's not much betting in this country for those who predict a loser, rather than naming a winner, is there?? you brave soul you, bucking the odds of choosing one loser from many, rather than taking the easy way of picking the one winner!

The entire premise of your question is mistaken. Perhaps you haven't read my past posts ... which is completely understandable.

But I've posted many times that I am not a "handicapper" ... I haven't placed a serious bet on a horse since 1967. I don't have the time that's required to follow day-to-day racing to the extent that's needed in order to be a successful bettor ... and I know it ... that's why I don't bet.

But I do have the time to watch and analyze G1 dirt racing ... which is what I've been doing since 1958 ... and I'm knowledgable enough to recognize when a horse doesn't finish his races with conviction against weak fields ... and is thus very vulnerable against strong fields.

Lost In The Fog is not himself a fraud ... he's just a horse ... it's the over-the-top over-evaluation he was given by naïve goo-goos that was ... and is ... fraudulent.

You do understand that ... don't you?