![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 107.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Papi Chullo got a 109, looks like he's finally in the right hands after some pretty terrible handling...
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I heard it was 107 five minutes ago but whatever.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Maybe there's a typo on the Beyer leaderboard, or they upped it a point today, who knows?
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree with your original post....it's basically an impossible number to do mathematically as the race was run exactly like a turf race. 106 or 107 seems fair.
Whatever the case, they are two terrific horses, and they put on a helluva show. Greatest game in the world. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The Belmont number is usually pretty irrelevant even with a normal pace.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The Belmont number is hard to figure when you have a decent pace. It gets more difficult when you have such slow fractions. I thought the winner would get a 110 or so, but I didn't think the race would be contested so slowly. But like BTW said, great race by two very very good horses. It was a treat to watch. Just wish I could have been there.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The Belmont figure is hard to calculate due to the lack of 12 furlong races run. Based on the figs these horses have run I think the projection was acccurate. It was a great race and was the only time I can recall having chills and goosebumps after a horse race. I'm glad I had seats near the finish line and was able to watch the race in person.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |