#21
|
||||
|
||||
Dean Butler, Jesus Castanon, and Bill Troilo .....It was like the 3 stooges met the Wizard of Oz.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Yea, like you really could forget that, bitch.
Don't think so. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I feel bad for your dogs.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I just realized the sequence the Subway crazy is talking about was in 2005. 14 years ago?
I can’t stop laughing. I can’t remember what I did 14 minutes ago, but I’m bitter towards him because 14 years ago I lost a pick 3 and he won? I guess anything to NOT have an intelligent conversation about what actually happened in the Derby. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I just looked and I didn’t join this site until 2006.
Hmmmm.... I wonder if Andy Beyer (or anyone else) wants to change their opinion on the DQ after seeing Scuds performance. I know I would. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
"I just looked and I didn’t join this site until 2006.
Hmmmm...." That's called an assertion. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
"Dude....everyone is laughing at you. You’re a clown."
That's some sort of logical fallacy. Actually, that's what most of your stuff is right now. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
"I feel bad for your dogs."
Pity based on a false premise. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
"I wonder if Andy Beyer (or anyone else) wants to change their opinion on the DQ after seeing Scuds performance. I know I would."
Combining a false premise with guilt by association. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
"I guess anything to NOT have an intelligent conversation about what actually happened in the Derby."
That's yet another false premise (used to try to produce guilt, or to gain some sort of moral high ground.) We had that conversation. We disagreed. God forbid. So, you are bringing out all sorts of logical fallacies (ad hominems, mainly) because I said something about one of your many favorite protected pets in the industry, I suppose. You like to attach yourself to those that you appear to think are better than yourself, and better than most "others." Bouncer for your horsey stars, I guess. Very Corey Lewandowski-ish. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
I was wondering how this lunatic would twist the fact he’s dead wrong about this pick 3 nonsense since I wasn’t even a member here in 2005.
I got my answer. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I can’t wait for Scuds next post. Each one is better than the next
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regardless of all of that, this alleged situation happened 14 years ago. I thought my wife was bad at not letting stuff go but she’s got nothing on Scuds. For the record, if my wife asks, I never said that. While I’m at it, I take issue with the constant reference to sadism. If anything, we are masochists since we continue to bet on horse racing despite the many, many letdowns that we’ve all experienced. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Am I bitter at Rudeboyelvis too? Did he hit a pick 3 a dozen years ago too? And yeah....we’re masochists if anything. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
By his own admission, Breyer says that War of Will may have finished fifth and Long Range Toddy and Bodexpress surely were cost a placing. I’m sure Beyer understands that “could they have won” is not the standard needed here.
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020) Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Beyer’s NEVER been wrong about racing related things before, huh Scuds?!
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the laugh!
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
It seems a reasonable question to ask, “Why are you so angry?” It’s not exactly clear to me WHO you are angry with either.
|