7/24 (MTH): Lady's Secret S. feat. Rachel Alexandra

[robfla]

11th (5:50)

Lady's Secret S.

1 1/8 Miles | Fillies and Mares | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $400,000

Post # Horse Jockey Weight Claim Price Equip. Med.
1 Stage Trick Trujillo E 118 L
2 Queen Martha Bravo J 118 L
3 Ask the Moon Rose J 118 L
4 Hark Marquez C H Jr 118 L
5 Rachel Alexandra Borel C H 123 L
6 Fabulous Babe Fragoso P 118 L
7 Yes She's a Lady Castro E 120 L

[robfla]

I haven't heard of any of these horse ( Rachel excluded )

[Sightseek]

crinkle












trash can

[NTamm1215]

It's an absolutely pitiful field, but there are a few who have some speed.

NT

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

It's an absolutely pitiful field, but there are a few who have some speed.

NT

What does that mean? She should get a Mother Goose like trip and win by 25... Ughhh only if Icon Project was still in training.

[Sightseek]

Chuck,
I think next time you can't get one of Bob's horses entered you should call up Monmouth and let them know that while you may not be running Rachel Alexandra, you're bringing Mr. Chicago and you'd like your own race carded.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

What does that mean? She should get a Mother Goose like trip and win by 25... Ughhh only if Icon Project was still in training.

Hopefully she's reversed the trend but the confidence that there was last year when Rachel took on her own sex does not exist this year.

That being said, she could probably win the race if they gave those other crows a 70 yd head start.

NT

[knickslions2]

and yet people still criticize who Zenyatta runs against. I can find a trotter to beat this field.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by knickslions2

and yet people still criticize who Zenyatta runs against. I can find a trotter to beat this field.

You may find this hard to understand, but Rachel Alexandra's weak schedule this year doesn't, in any way, excuse or validate Zenyatta's equally pathetic campaign.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You may find this hard to understand, but Rachel Alexandra's weak schedule this year doesn't, in any way, excuse or validate Zenyatta's pathetic campaign.

What do you not understand? Rachel and Z were supposed to run at Oaklawn, who showed up and cruised, payed workout and who was home?
I dont understand why this is such an argument, Z ran in the biggest race last year and showed up at Oaklawn.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You may find this hard to understand, but Rachel Alexandra's weak schedule this year doesn't, in any way, excuse or validate Zenyatta's equally pathetic campaign.

I do not believe anyone pointing out this fabricated race at Monmouth is looking to validate or excuse what you call Zenyatta's pathetic campaign .

Zenyatta could have been more ambitiously placed, but her campaign this year absolutely does trump Rachel's--and it remains a perfect score .

I can not see how that is difficult for you .

50 percent of Rachel's races have been tailored for her, and she has lost 2/3 of her efforts to date .

None of Zenyatta's races have been tailored for her, and they have been grade 1 races exclusively including handicaps .

Both mares have been running on easy street this year, but so far Rachel's has simply been the more pathetic course .