A Make You Sick Story

[dellinger63]

I suppose when the Commander and Chief is on his knees satisfying his 'friends' his army must follow?

What's next American wives and girlfriends told not to say/do anything that might be construed as offensive to their potentially abusive husbands?

In the Spring of this year, US Army Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Dooley was condemned by the Joints Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and relieved of teaching duties at Joint Forces Staff College for teaching a course judged to be offensive to Islam.

The fact that Lt. Col. Dooley is a highly decorated combat veteran with nearly 20 years of service under his belt apparently held little or no sway with the JCS. As a matter of fact, JCS Chairman General Martin Dempsey "personally attacked" Lt. Col. Dooley on C-Span on May 10, 2012, during a Pentagon News Conference.

Former CIA agent Claire M. Lopez commented on the state of things: "All US military Combatant Commands, Services, the National Guard Bureau, and Joint Chiefs are under Dempsey's Muslim Brotherhood-dictated order to ensure that henceforth, no US military course will ever again teach truth about Islam that the jihadist enemy finds offensive (or just too informative)."

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...ticizing-Islam

[hi_im_god]

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012...tal-war-islam/

you're right. the story you posted made me sick.

the fact that right wing blogs are taking up the case of someone who advocates throwing out the geneva convention and nuking civilian populations is more than a little disheartening.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012...tal-war-islam/

you're right. the story you posted made me sick.

the fact that right wing blogs are taking up the case of someone who advocates throwing out the geneva convention and nuking civilian populations is more than a little disheartening.

The Geneva convention covers uniformed personal. Are we to presume a long beard and head scarf are now uniforms? I don't think so.

When a religion, any religion's holy book and doctrine preaches “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war” there is a problem and not just with said religion's militants.

[joeydb]

On the Geneva convention:

Does anybody else find the idea of "rules" in war amusing?

Goes right up there with the U.N. "strongly condemning" the action of a state and then either doing nothing or using a disproportional number of U.S. troops for whatever action is selected. But what do you guys want for your 23% support of that inept and useless organization.