NFL Betting Log - Page 3

Danzig · #41 09-30-2014, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62

Is Brady Done?

not yet

RockHardTen1985 · #42 09-30-2014, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62

Is Brady Done?

Come on man. KC at night is a tough place to play, we both liked them before the game. Brady has a bottom 5 WR group and no real running game. We have wasted draft picks on QB's recently, one of them who is now in Houston.... Instead of putting weapons around Tom.

jms62 · #43 09-30-2014, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Come on man. KC at night is a tough place to play, we both liked them before the game. Brady has a bottom 5 WR group and no real running game. We have wasted draft picks on QB's recently, one of them who is now in Houston.... Instead of putting weapons around Tom.

It was a question as I am not sure. He has looked horrible thus far and his expiration date is approaching. If they dont have the tools to surround him with then what more can he do?

3kings · #44 09-30-2014, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62

Is Brady Done?

He never liked to be hit but now seems unwilling to take the hit to make the play. This combined with awful WR's and a mediocre line will be tough to overcome. He's certainly on the way down and Belicheck knows it.

RockHardTen1985 · #45 09-30-2014, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62

It was a question as I am not sure. He has looked horrible thus far and his expiration date is approaching. If they dont have the tools to surround him with then what more can he do?

He cant do anything, but if he was put on Denver, Seattle or any team with weapons he would be fine. He would make Detroit the 2nd best team in the NFC right now.

Pants II · #46 10-01-2014, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

He cant do anything, but if he was put on Denver, Seattle or any team with weapons he would be fine. He would make Detroit the 2nd best team in the NFC right now.

He would not.

He's a system qb. The new pretty boy will probably win them a super bowl in the next 3 years.

Danzig · #47 10-01-2014, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings

He never liked to be hit but now seems unwilling to take the hit to make the play. This combined with awful WR's and a mediocre line will be tough to overcome. He's certainly on the way down and Belicheck knows it.

he doesn't have the protection he had before. i don't care how good the qb is, if he has no time, he won't do much.

Crown@club · #48 10-01-2014, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

He cant do anything, but if he was put on Denver, Seattle or any team with weapons he would be fine. He would make Detroit the 2nd best team in the NFC right now.

There is no way he is better than Stafford. His arm strength is dwindling. Calvin Johnson will be out-running Brady's throws even on a bad ankle.

I agree with Coach. He was always a system QB, made famous by a stupid tuck rule, who was lucky to play with some pretty good defenses over his career.

Pants II · #49 10-01-2014, 12:50 PM

The sad thing is they'll probably still win the division.

If I were a Jets fan I'd be super pissed. Ryan shouldn't be the head coach.

Another wasted year.

Danzig · #50 10-01-2014, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown@club

There is no way he is better than Stafford. He arm strength is dwindling. Calvin Johnson will be out-running Brady's throws even on a bad ankle.

I agree with Coach. He was always a system QB. Made famous by a stupid tuck rule that was lucky to play with some pretty good defenses over his career.

that system certainly made cassel look good when he filled in for brady.

just looked like a completely different team vs kc monday night.

Rudeboyelvis · #51 10-01-2014, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

that system certainly made cassel look good when he filled in for brady.

just looked like a completely different team vs kc monday night.

Inexplicably trading away Logan Mankins for basically a backup TE to Tampa when you already have deep OL woes should be a clear signal that all is not well there.
It's as if they are forcing Brady's hand here - "Thanks for the memories, Tom, but we need to get younger at your position before we dedicate cap space for protection". He's got no receivers, a half-assed backfield, and no OL.

What could go wrong?

hi_im_god · #52 10-01-2014, 08:02 PM

They dressed 3 wide receivers for the game.

"It's 3rd and 18, let's try a 4 receiver set and spread the defense. We run Gronk out 15 yards in the middle and have Vereen block before heading downfield"

"Uh, we can't"

Tom Brady might be in decline. But it's hard to judge given the other problems on offense.

RockHardTen1985 · #53 10-01-2014, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown@club

There is no way he is better than Stafford. His arm strength is dwindling. Calvin Johnson will be out-running Brady's throws even on a bad ankle.

I agree with Coach. He was always a system QB, made famous by a stupid tuck rule, who was lucky to play with some pretty good defenses over his career.

He is much better then Stafford right now today still. What has Stafford done in this league other then underachieve??

RockHardTen1985 · #54 10-01-2014, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

that system certainly made cassel look good when he filled in for brady.

just looked like a completely different team vs kc monday night.

I think part of that is because KC is really good. Pats are not that good this year thats a fact, but they will go 10-6. And they will 100% beat the Bengals this week.

Danzig · #55 10-01-2014, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Inexplicably trading away Logan Mankins for basically a backup TE to Tampa when you already have deep OL woes should be a clear signal that all is not well there.
It's as if they are forcing Brady's hand here - "Thanks for the memories, Tom, but we need to get younger at your position before we dedicate cap space for protection". He's got no receivers, a half-assed backfield, and no OL.

What could go wrong?

yeah, that made no sense at all to get rid of him. and didn't tom help them out on his contract so they had money for others?
yeah, no player should do that...cause when the time comes, you're gone no matter how helpful you were thinking you were in the past.

dellinger63 · #56 10-02-2014, 06:36 PM

Week 5

Minus 80 to start

Minn. +8 $200
Minn./Over 46.5 parlay $100

RockHardTen1985 · #57 10-02-2014, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

3-3 on year.

3-3 going into this game.
Packers minus 8 is the play tonight. Under what scenario is Minnesota even competitive?

Crown@club · #58 10-02-2014, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I think part of that is because KC is really good. Pats are not that good this year thats a fact, but they will go 10-6. And they will 100% beat the Bengals this week.

Ah!!! Andy Dalton 18-6 SU/ATS in games off a win facing non-division opponent, including 6-0 during 1st 4 games of the season. Your 100% guarantee that the Pats will win, makes me feel so comfortable that the Bengals win on the road

Crown@club · #59 10-02-2014, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

He is much better then Stafford right now today still. What has Stafford done in this league other then underachieve??

Give Stafford a defense that can stop teams, then 2011 and 2012 can't so easily be forgotten.

If Brady was a Bear for his career, he wouldn't even be playing right now. Story always has been, you hit Brady and he is easily rattled. Hmm! HapPending quite a bit now

jms62 · #60 10-03-2014, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

3-3 going into this game.
Packers minus 8 is the play tonight. Under what scenario is Minnesota even competitive?

Certainly no scenario involving Christan Ponder