|
|
 |
|
#1
07-03-2007, 11:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Arlington jockeys sue Illinois owners, trainers
Are we attaching the stable to this lawsuit by running there?
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...-trainers.aspx Tom 
|
|
#4
07-03-2007, 04:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
07-03-2007, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Damn the torpedos. Full speed ahead!
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls... Bodyguard: One of his is crystal.
|
|
#6
07-04-2007, 07:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not concerned about increase in jock fees, even if we'd have to pay a little more later on. But when I read the word "damages", well that piqued my interest....
|
|
#7
07-04-2007, 09:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
says damages seeked are 3X the difference..... so... if they up the jock charges go up say $10 and your horse has run once this year, the damages seeked against you would only be $30 (plus the $10 extra since they want it backdated to the beginning of the meet).
As long as you run a horse there, you'd be included in this.
|
|
#8
07-04-2007, 09:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
frickin pinheads.they never had it so good at arlington..full fields lots of mounts to go around...amazing...........
|
|
#9
07-04-2007, 11:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
07-08-2007, 08:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
talked with an owner yesterday who agreed to $40 more for non-check rides in the future and has settled with Earlie and the Guild excusing himself from the suit. This apparantly was close to being settled and Frank Kirby has a lot to do with courts becoming involved. The jocks will end up getting a substantial raise. IMO
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
Linear Mode
