American Pharoah points to Breeders' Cup Classic

[Seattleallstar]

Wtf when did he get hurt

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar

Wtf when did he get hurt

Ankle chip removed in July I believe

[Merlinsky]

Originally Posted by Danzig

If he's on your list of greats, it must be a looooooong list.

Now now. Firstly, he ranked #49 on the Bloodhorse's top 100 of the 20th century list (between Personal Ensign and Dahlia) so I'd say he certainly qualifies for that term. Secondly, Sir Barton had bad feet to deal with, and it's thought that they were probably affecting him during the MOW match race. As difficult as it would've been to beat MOW he probably would've been closer at the finish. When Sir Barton was at his best, he was pretty talented and he'd be given more credit were it not for those blasted feet.

[Danzig]

I have that book...it's great to look over.
But if we did a book of truly great horses...how long a list? Because if its too long, (and I think sir barton would be even further down with us being 15 years into a new century) you would water down the meaning of greatness.

The bid should be on a list with sir barton? Or secretariat?
That's why I said it would be a long list. And I don't think a list of greats should be long.

[GenuineRisk]

All I know is, after watching the season premiere of "Dancing With the Stars" last night, if Victor maintains his current level of footwork, he won't have long to worry about the show interfering with his riding.

(No shame, Victor. I gots two left feet myself.)

[Alabama Stakes]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I have that book...it's great to look over.
But if we did a book of truly great horses...how long a list? Because if its too long, (and I think sir barton would be even further down with us being 15 years into a new century) you would water down the meaning of greatness.

The bid should be on a list with sir barton? Or secretariat?
That's why I said it would be a long list. And I don't think a list of greats should be long.

Spectacular Bid is on every list, as he should be. Ran fast...real fast...every time

[senator L]

I think the one true measure of greatness is wins and losses.
The notion that the best horse is the one with the best Beyer is folly.
I also think there are levels of greatness ie; great horses, all time
greats and the greatest of all time (insert trumpet music)

[robfla]

Originally Posted by senator L

I think the one true measure of greatness is wins and losses.
The notion that the best horse is the one with the best Beyer is folly.
I also think there are levels of greatness ie; great horses, all time
greats and the greatest of all time (insert trumpet music)

so I guess Pepper's Pride is the all time greatest

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by robfla

so I guess Pepper's Pride is the all time greatest

rapid redux

[OldDog]

AP is great for his time, but he needs a BC win to cement himself as anything close to an all time great.

[robfla]

Originally Posted by Danzig

rapid redux

Rapid Redux had at least 14 losses though

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by robfla

Rapid Redux had at least 14 losses though

ah, i was just focusing on his win streak....

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by OldDog

AP is great for his time, but he needs a BC win to cement himself as anything close to an all time great.

Its gonna be tough for any horse these days to break into that all time great category.

A) Most of them don't run enough
B) If they do run for a long time, everyone questions the type of horses they're running against.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

Its gonna be tough for any horse these days to break into that all time great category.

A) Most of them don't run enough
B) If they do run for a long time, everyone questions the type of horses they're running against.

i just want to know how we went from deepest crop in years to 'who has he beaten'?

[casp0555]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i just want to know how we went from deepest crop in years to 'who has he beaten'?