Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:29 PM
fpsoxfan's Avatar
fpsoxfan fpsoxfan is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Plain
Posts: 2,478
Default Done till Spa. F horse racing

Yup. I did have Maximum Security. Let’s get that straight.
With that said folks, that DQ was horrible. These fick$ing assholes wonder why
People are going to casinos. A complete disgrace to the sport of horse racing.
I’m done. This decision is a complete reflection of America today.
Complete pussification. And fuc$ bill Mott. I can’t wait to see that puke at Saratoga. I’ll get bounced but it will be worth it. **** this ****!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:39 PM
opusone opusone is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Pete
Posts: 164
Default

He knows in heart he did not win the Derby. Muddy track and the horse slides a bit. 20 would not have won.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:41 PM
Alabama Stakes Alabama Stakes is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: suffolk downs
Posts: 5,811
Default

Terrible DQ . 1 Hoss had no opening and forced his way up in there. Bullshrt call
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:43 PM
tanner12oz tanner12oz is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,412
Default

Best horse didn't win...call I'm actually about with. I'm blown away that they flipped it though. Congrats to horse racing to taking 2 mins and turning it into 30
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:50 PM
Kitan Kitan is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Other side of the globe
Posts: 1,204
Default

There was no stewards inquiry. Objection was 20 vs 7. The interference from 7 onto 20 did not affect the result.

Was there an objection from other riders? No. Was there an official inquiry looking at other events? No.

Given that, anything other than the 7 staying up is farcical.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:53 PM
opusone opusone is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Pete
Posts: 164
Default

To me it feels like the Derby did not happen.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2019, 11:36 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitan View Post
There was no stewards inquiry. Objection was 20 vs 7. The interference from 7 onto 20 did not affect the result.

Was there an objection from other riders? No. Was there an official inquiry looking at other events? No.

Given that, anything other than the 7 staying up is farcical.
The 18 also claimed foul.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:45 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

I don't post here very often at all, but I've literally seen it all today.

Full Disclosure: while I respected Country House, I did not use the horse in my trifecta. So I personally don't really have a b*tch coming to me - from a bettor standpoint - anyway.

I've seen bad takedowns, some of which I've benefitted from, some of which were ignored and also benefitted from. And vise versa.

Today marks a brand new chapter in abject absurdity. A chapter where brain-dead, know-nothing-about-the-sport *Chief Stewards* are Charged with making decisions that affect literally ten's of millions of dollars of hard-earned wagering dollars.

This CANNOT go unchallenged. The integrity of the sport (or what's left of it) is at stake.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:48 PM
knickslions2's Avatar
knickslions2 knickslions2 is online now
Longchamps
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
I don't post here very often at all, but I've literally seen it all today.

Full Disclosure: while I respected Country House, I did not use the horse in my trifecta. So I personally don't really have a b*tch coming to me - from a bettor standpoint - anyway.

I've seen bad takedowns, some of which I've benefitted from, some of which I've were ignored and also benefitted from. And vise versa.

Today marks a brand new chapter in abject absurdity. A chapter where brain-dead, know-nothing-about-the-sport *Chief Stewards* are Charged with making decisions that affect literally ten's of millions of dollars of hard-earned wagering dollars.

This CANNOT go unchallenged. The integrity of the sport (or what's left of it) is at stake.
Dan this was worst travesty I ever saw and I have no betting interest in this. I will watch tomorrow when I’m sober but I’m not drunk enough to think this was fair.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:52 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,295
Default

I thought it was the right call. The winner absolutely fouled War of Will. I’m not sure how that is even debatable.

I feel for anyone that bet Maximum Security but a foul is a foul. I’d expect the same result on a Monday at Parx as I do in the Derby.

Integrity is taking the horse down that fouled a horse and cost him a placing. Not taking him down because it’s the Derby would be the opposite of that.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:59 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
I thought it was the right call. The winner absolutely fouled War of Will. I’m not sure how that is even debatable.

I feel for anyone that bet Maximum Security but a foul is a foul. I’d expect the same result on a Monday at Parx as I do in the Derby.

Integrity is taking the horse down that fouled a horse and cost him a placing. Not taking him down because it’s the Derby would be the opposite of that.
War of Will absolutely was fouled. Hossy you are correct - no debate.
Gafflione was interviewed and said he had no horse, regardless of MS coming out. The fact remains - Country House was never touched, never vied for the lead but was put up based on nonsense.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-04-2019, 07:01 PM
Heels1989's Avatar
Heels1989 Heels1989 is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 2,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
War of Will absolutely was fouled. Hossy you are correct - no debate.
Gafflione was interviewed and said he had no horse, regardless of MS coming out. The fact remains - Country House was never touched, never vied for the lead but was put up based on nonsense.
^^^this!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-2019, 07:02 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
War of Will absolutely was fouled. Hossy you are correct - no debate.
Gafflione was interviewed and said he had no horse, regardless of MS coming out. The fact remains - Country House was never touched, never vied for the lead but was put up based on nonsense.
I think MS was DQ’d for fouling War of Will though. That’s why he was placed behind him.

Total agreement Country House wasn’t fouled.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2019, 07:01 PM
fpsoxfan's Avatar
fpsoxfan fpsoxfan is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Plain
Posts: 2,478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
I thought it was the right call. The winner absolutely fouled War of Will. I’m not sure how that is even debatable.

I feel for anyone that bet Maximum Security but a foul is a foul. I’d expect the same result on a Monday at Parx as I do in the Derby.

Integrity is taking the horse down that fouled a horse and cost him a placing. Not taking him down because it’s the Derby would be the opposite of that.
Ok. Tell that to the crowd that was booing. You’ve seen worse Hoss and you know it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-04-2019, 07:03 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fpsoxfan View Post
Ok. Tell that to the crowd that was booing. You’ve seen worse Hoss and you know it.
I’m sorry you lost but the crowd booing doesn’t matter.

I’ve seen worse stay up and I’ve seen less come down. It has no bearing on what happened today.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-04-2019, 07:04 PM
fpsoxfan's Avatar
fpsoxfan fpsoxfan is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Plain
Posts: 2,478
Default

If the 1 got second I’d be more convinced. Bad call. I saw mike smith do worse multiple timee including travers day
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-04-2019, 11:32 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
I thought it was the right call. The winner absolutely fouled War of Will. I’m not sure how that is even debatable.

I feel for anyone that bet Maximum Security but a foul is a foul. I’d expect the same result on a Monday at Parx as I do in the Derby.

Integrity is taking the horse down that fouled a horse and cost him a placing. Not taking him down because it’s the Derby would be the opposite of that.
^^^ I'm on this page.

I had no financial interest here, I bet Game Winner. The reality is he fouled War of Will AND started a chain reaction with the 18 AND sent Code of Honor into the rail all within the same 100 yards. He HAD to come down. There was no gray area with regard to the rule. War of Will finished 8th and I'm 100% certain he would have finished better than that if he was not fouled- the rule is if you foul someone and the horse that's fouled has been compromised on potential for finishing higher you get taken down. End of story. If this was the 1st on a Monday at Parx like you said, it would not even be debatable and we would be turning the page. The stewards did the right thing not just for the result but for the safety of the game.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:52 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knickslions2 View Post
Dan this was worst travesty I ever saw and I have no betting interest in this. I will watch tomorrow when I’m sober but I’m not drunk enough to think this was fair.
Tom, This is the first time in a while that I was sober for it.. I need to get back to drinking if this is how it works
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-04-2019, 06:59 PM
knickslions2's Avatar
knickslions2 knickslions2 is online now
Longchamps
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 13,442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Tom, This is the first time in a while that I was sober for it.. I need to get back to drinking if this is how it works
This is all because it was Servis. Even Mott agrees they weren’t right. This was a joke.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-05-2019, 02:52 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Tom, This is the first time in a while that I was sober for it.. I need to get back to drinking if this is how it works
Serling ( and all the others that lazily tossed out Max) needed a bail out. Of course, they took it.

Duh.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.