7/24 (MTH): Lady's Secret S. feat. Rachel Alexandra

[Smooth Operator]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Another non betting Zenyattatard. How surprising....

Lol ... they take down my post about Z's work today but leave this clown's drivel up.

Too funny

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Lol ... they take down my post about Z's work today but leave this clown's drivel up.

Too funny

How did she work today? Repost it.

[Port Conway Lane]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Surprised a thread was even started for a garbage race like this...

And only one person has talked about the race. I'd like to know if anyone thinks there is a good play underneath. I think it looks chalky with the 1 and 2 filling out the tri only because they have the best recent form. Races with overwhelming favorites can produce longshots underneath but this race is loaded with front end types. It's difficult to project which horses will attempt to come from off of the pace and which ones are capable of doing so.

[Merlinsky]

When it comes to Rachel v. Zenyatta v. whatever straw man people wanna put together, I'm slowly going bonkers. I imagine this guy muttering to himself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8CrvGndKzE

Originally Posted by johnny pinwheel

someone with a realistic outlook. i don't even understand the argument, seeing that i'm not a bandwagon jumper. so, i won't even mention names....just the facts. one horse is doing really well, the other is not. one horse shipped in (oaklawn) ready to run for 5 million......on dirt, the other did not. one horse is knocking down grade 1's, the other is running in some ridiculous set up race. one horse will be at the BC classic...on dirt, if all is well. from the schedule of the other horse....well, i'll believe it when i see it.....its so painfully obvious....its not even funny. i hope the race happens and i get to bet it because if the odds are even close...its free money........lol. i could care less about the rachelist or the zentards.. i care about the reality of who is winning and who is not...when i bet. this is 2010, not 2009....throw last years forms out and its not even close.

One horse had a 5 month layoff hanging around in a stall without a stitch of training, one did not. One had a winning formula that came apart when they tried to change her running style, her bit, and her training methods. One did not. One has an owner a la Jerry Jones who enjoys the micromanaging experience. One does not. We could do this all day. And bringing up number of G1s is kinda silly when it's more like "G1"s that she's won 2-3 times apiece. It's more significant that she won them with her running style--that's where Zenyatta gets more points from me. Not that she won so many G1s or maybe even the Classic. It's that she gives everybody a bloody head start each time, 17 straight. Tout that. To me, it's more impressive than beating Anabaa's Creation could ever be. She should've lost regardless of talent just from getting into trouble. What's painfully obvious to me is neither one is in a position to win HOY as they stand right now--we gotta see more in the next few months or both connections will remain seated at the Eclipse Awards when they get to that category.

[TouchOfGrey]

Monmouth is giving away Rachel Alexandra T-Shirts with paid admission.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

My memory isn't as good as it used to be, but it's still pretty good. Now, of course that doesn't matter. But, save the pretentious crap for someone else. If you are going to be hammering points home to people back it up a little at the window, k?

Great research--and no I do not bet anymore on horses--not in the last five years. There is no mandate that one can not have an opinion on a horse without backing it up at the windows, even though you suppose it is true .

Are you fixing to bet me on something ???

I have backed it up at the window in the past, and I have gambled OUTSIDE of horseracing to the present--not that it is any of your business...

I do not consider gambling some big virtue, but I have gambled up to 5,000 bucks and the keys to my TVR--won both .

No big deal .

The very nature of my business is a gamble, and my return over 15 years is 300 percent, as is my lifetime return on playing the ponies from the day I put my allowance on Tim Tam in grade school .

Now piss off..

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by prudery

Great research--and no I do not bet anymore on horses--not in the last five years. There is no mandate that one can not have an opinion on a horse without backing it up at the windows, even though you suppose it is true .

Are you fixing to bet me on something ???

I have backed it up at the window in the past, and I have gambled OUTSIDE of horseracing to the present--not that it is any of your business...

I do not consider gambling some big virtue, but I have gambled up to 5,000 bucks and the keys to my TVR--won both .

No big deal .

The very nature of my business is a gamble, and my return over 15 years is 300 percent, as is my lifetime return on playing the ponies from the day I put my allowance on Tim Tam in grade school .

Now piss off..

Is this serious or just messing with Hoss?

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Is this serious or just messing with Hoss?

It's complicated and quite frankly I'm not in the mood for bird noises today.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Is this serious or just messing with Hoss?

Serious about what ???

If serious means true, then yes .

" Messing " with Hoss is subjective .. That was my answer to him .

Originally Posted by prudery

Serious about what ???

If serious means true, then yes .

" Messing " with Hoss is subjective .. That was my answer to him .

Do you have a Hedge or Hedgehog fund?

[prudery]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Do you have a Hedge or Hedgehog fund?

Are there hedgefunds in the aviary ???

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by prudery

Serious about what ???

If serious means true, then yes .

" Messing " with Hoss is subjective .. That was my answer to him .

If you have that type of ROI, you should be living well and living off horses.

Originally Posted by prudery

Are there hedgefunds in the aviary ???

You've got a point.

You won't get rich but the hedgehog fund is a niche market. Proper marketing and you can triple your earnings in 2 years easy. Of course, it helps if you can handle a few pricks now and then...which I'm sure you could.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

If you have that type of ROI, you should be living well and living off horses.

One may have that type of ROI, but the original investment may make the return less impressive--just saying .

I would rather live ON a horse than off them ..

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by prudery

I would rather live ON a horse than off them ..

That would be a great signature line.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

You've got a point.

You won't get rich but the hedgehog fund is a niche market. Proper marketing and you can triple your earnings in 2 years easy. Of course, it helps if you can handle a few pricks now and then...which I'm sure you could.

I have never been rich but have managed to live ncely as I spent what I had well .. Earning big bucks at whatever I did never happened .

What I have needs to work harder for me ....

I will take this up with my investment counselor--something new for me ..

As I stated prior, the 300 percent was garnered from modest output and modest betting over time... On the ponies I never bet more than 50 bucks ..

The 5 grand bet was a mortal lock and the other person should never have taken it --in fact I advised them not to...

As far as pricks go, you nailed it ..

[prudery]

Originally Posted by OldDog

That would be a great signature line.

It would--thanks ...

Getting ready to ride the little bay boy in my avatar ...

[Alan07]

Wagering Menu:
WPS, Exacta, Trifecta, Super, DD

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by LARHAGE

Just Jenda would be 1-9 against this field if no Rachel, at least she is a recent stakes winner, these others are frigging claimers.

No she wouldn't.

She'd be no shorter than 9/5.