Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 09-13-2010, 09:55 PM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 View Post
Flacco has all the tools, ALL OF THEM. Battle tested? He is 20x better then Sanchez. He had a bad game tonight, simple... Now all the sudden he is not battle tested? I guess going into New England in the playoffs and winning is nothing.
I said he was battle tested try reading it again.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-13-2010, 09:56 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings View Post
I said he was battle tested try reading it again.
That was the problem the first time. He tried reading it.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 09-13-2010, 09:59 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
What a shock. A heartbreaking 1-point loss in which you vastly outplay the other team.
The two defenses were about a push.

The Ravens offensive unit was slightly better.

The Jets special teams unit was way better.

All in all ... they didn't vastly outplay anyone. They lost an even game because they were more sloppy. Edwards wasn't set - and two of the guys in their secondary were flagged over and over.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-13-2010, 10:00 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaTH716 View Post
It's hard to think that they are as hyped as the Jets are, but I live in the NY area, so obviously it's skewed.

Defensively they played well, as far as stopping the Jets strength which is running the ball. The Jets never got a passing game going, whether it was the Ravens D or the ineptness of the Jets offensive, probably a litle of both. But they did keep the Jets to a FG after Flacco fumbled their first play from scrimmage. So they did make some plays.

Offensively the Ravens were OK against a very good defensive team. It seemed like they didn't have very good field position often. But they took some chances throwing the ball and made more plays then the Jets. By no means did they look like an offensive juggernaut tonight. Also of course it seemed like every call went their way.

Bottom line is that I think the Ravens are a very good team and good teams find to win a game like that tonight (let alone on the road). As far as the Jets go, I still believe (just like on their playoff run) that they could go as far as Sanchez can take them. But offensively they stunk tonight.
I saw a lot of "experts" talking about the Ravens having a big shot at making the Super Bowl. Their offense was vastly improved, etc. By no means am I'm blaiming the refs, because the Ravens absolutely made more plays than the Jets did tonight. But as you said it did seem like every call went their way.

Either way, I don't want to jump the gun on anyone because it's week one. But if both teams don't improve they will be watching the playoffs from home.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-13-2010, 10:03 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah if I were to jump the gun I'd be going crazy over the Titans.

But I'm a realist. Field Goal Fisher won't let it happen.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 09-13-2010, 10:09 PM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants View Post
Yeah if I were to jump the gun I'd be going crazy over the Titans.

But I'm a realist. Field Goal Fisher won't let it happen.
Do you think V. Young is good enough if the good defensive teams are able to contain Johnson? They might be weaker against the run this year.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 09-13-2010, 10:11 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings View Post
Do you think V. Young is good enough if the good defensive teams are able to contain Johnson? They might be weaker against the run this year.
If he's not then Kerry Collins could do it. He's an every other year qb. This is a good year.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 09-13-2010, 10:41 PM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
You buying into my NFL theories yet?
Phil, I'm always interested in hearing another perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 09-13-2010, 11:34 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings View Post
Phil, I'm always interested in hearing another perspective.
Whether the NFL acknowledges it publicly or not, these games have a TON OF MONEY riding on them. A good MNF matchup can get $250 million in action worldwide from estimates I've been told- 1st week of the season, hyped game, probably even more. This game had a TON of general money on the Jets- yet the line continued to drop. Additionally, the big bettors surely got their middles lined up at Ravens +3, and bought it back at game time at around PK. So what happens if the Jets drive down and kick a FG to win by 2? Basically EVERYBODY WINS and the bookies get absolutely drowned. Now, would you think this would actually be allowed to happen? Of course not! Hell, one time Vegas literally pulled the plug on a game they would have lost roughly $10 million on (Wisconsin-UNLV, look it up.) Everybody can be bought for the right price.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 09-13-2010, 11:39 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings View Post
Phil, I'm always interested in hearing another perspective.
BTW, just for sake of estimation of scope, $82.7 million was wagered legally in Nevada on the Super Bowl; this is estimated as 1.5% of total (illegal or offshore) wagering, so in essence $1.2 billion (not including boxes, etc.); $2.57 billion was wagered legally in Nevada in 2009 on all sports, of which more than 50% is on the NFL; so my $250 million number for MNF probably isn't too far off.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 09-13-2010, 11:44 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
BTW, just for sake of estimation of scope, $82.7 million was wagered legally in Nevada on the Super Bowl; this is estimated as 1.5% of total (illegal or offshore) wagering, so in essence $1.2 billion (not including boxes, etc.); $2.57 billion was wagered legally in Nevada in 2009 on all sports, of which more than 50% is on the NFL; so my $250 million number for MNF probably isn't too far off.
The NFL is what it is because of gambling, plain and simple. They are just a well run marketing machine that hasn't had to lean on 'gambling' to attract fans.

Fantasy football is gambling, anyone that tells you it isn't, is full of crap.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 09-13-2010, 11:46 PM
RockHardTen1985 RockHardTen1985 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants View Post
20x better? Yeah maybe he needs Robo-Jerry Rice and he'd score one more TD outside of the one the refs gave him

Get the f.uck out of here with that bs. Ravens won't do s.hit this year.
Now we are mad cause we lost. This is getting ugly in here, If not the Pats its the RAvens in the Super Bowl. DONE DEAL
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 09-13-2010, 11:51 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 View Post
Now we are mad cause we lost. This is getting ugly in here, If not the Pats its the RAvens in the Super Bowl. DONE DEAL
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33699
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 09-14-2010, 12:07 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 View Post
Now we are mad cause we lost. This is getting ugly in here, If not the Pats its the RAvens in the Super Bowl. DONE DEAL
It's hard not to get mad when telling a knuckle-dragger they are wrong. You said Flacco has all the tools. You're a god-damned imbecile for believing that. I could lose 100 games in a row and you would still be a f.ucking moron.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 09-14-2010, 02:32 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants View Post
It's hard not to get mad when telling a knuckle-dragger they are wrong. You said Flacco has all the tools. You're a god-damned imbecile for believing that. I could lose 100 games in a row and you would still be a f.ucking moron.
No energy left. So
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 09-14-2010, 02:47 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Ateam twittered me that 15-1 is a lock. Hope he pounded that over 9.5
Yeah, except you made that up. Glad you're so excited about 'your team' losing.

Typical Jet loss. Wilson PI was nonsense but they still couldn't bother to overcome a 1-point deficit. Offense is better off playing in Play-Skool jungle gyms than NFL games. They'll handle the Gaytriots though. Brady ain't ready to face that heat. He'll be fixing his hair while getting fisted in the ass. And we already know Revis has Moss on a leash, getting him to dump on the curb.

Last edited by ateamstupid : 09-14-2010 at 04:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 09-14-2010, 06:53 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
Yeah, except you made that up. Glad you're so excited about 'your team' losing.

Typical Jet loss. Wilson PI was nonsense but they still couldn't bother to overcome a 1-point deficit. Offense is better off playing in Play-Skool jungle gyms than NFL games. They'll handle the Gaytriots though. Brady ain't ready to face that heat. He'll be fixing his hair while getting fisted in the ass. And we already know Revis has Moss on a leash, getting him to dump on the curb.
I think people could tell it was a joke. When you let your fandom get in the way of good business sense you only hurt yourself. You'll learn.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 09-14-2010, 07:12 AM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default

sancho is in for a long season this year....all those weapons and the only thing he can complete a pass to is a checkdown.

having said that, bmore didn't beat them up and down the field like some might think. The PI penalties were kind of a joke, but i didn't think it would have mattered anyways the way sancho was tossing the rock.

-bt-
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 09-14-2010, 11:14 AM
kenny p kenny p is offline
Golden Gate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 393
Default

Ne-1.5 O/u 39
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 09-14-2010, 12:14 PM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

Jenkins out for the season.

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angele...ory?id=5571834
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.