Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:03 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Am I the only one who saw the BC classic and thought that Denman was out of his freaking mind saying what he did?

Her race certainly wasn't a bad one, but man, he went wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy overboard.

I have seen much better performances than that one. Even this year I have!

Well then perhaps a corneal transplant is recommended ..

Please ----why haven't you described all the races that trump this one--big lengths, fast, Rachel, Mine That Bird--the tenth at Canterbury ???!!!

A fascinating race that some refuse to see ...

Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...

" not a bad one"--don't make me laugh ...

Never have I seen such a good horse continually not believed in ..

She runs virtually the same race regardless of pace or opposition seemingly by design ... And does it easily ....

She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???

So far you haven't beat her, but won't join either...

And no I am not president of the pretty pony club--made my first bet--winning--at age 10 ...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:11 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???
She's less popular with bettors?

Here's her last 10 races.

* 5/2 favorite

* 2/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/2 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

I'd also say she had dominant numbers coming into 9 of those 10 races.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:19 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
She's less popular with bettors?

Here's her last 10 races.

* 5/2 favorite

* 2/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/2 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

I'd also say she had dominant numbers coming into 9 of those 10 races.


Sorry , I should have said GAMBLERS--there is a difference ...

Of course she was favored since Pearl Harbor ...

Bad choice of words on my part ...

Gamblers--you know the ones that tried to beat her also since Pearl Harbor and didn't ...
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:21 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Well then perhaps a corneal transplant is recommended ..
For me, or for you? I suggest you need two corneal transplants. One so that you can read what I actually said, and the other to help you learn to watch a race. If you think that's a top 5 or 10 race run in the 50 years you've been watching races, then frankly, you are beyond clueless.

Have you signed up with AARP yet?


Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Please ----why haven't you described all the races that trump this one--big lengths, fast, Rachel, Mine That Bird--the tenth at Canterbury ???!!!
I'm not sure how to react to that. Maybe "Huh?" or "Where did you learn reading comprehension? Perhaps you should have gone to school instead of learning how to read by being taught how to order off the McDonald's menu"

If you are asking me to name a race that was more impressive than this Classic, how about the Preakness from earlier this year? Oh yeah, I can't use that one since you already mocked that possibility above. How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?

Listen man, I never said her race wasn't at all impressive. What I did say was that the track announcer grossly overreacted.


Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
A fascinating race that some refuse to see ...

Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...

" not a bad one"--don't make me laugh ...

Never have I seen such a good horse continually not believed in ..

She runs virtually the same race regardless of pace or opposition seemingly by design ... And does it easily ....

She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???

So far you haven't beat her, but won't join either...

And no I am not president of the pretty pony club--made my first bet--winning--at age 10 ...
Ugh.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:25 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Gamblers--you know the ones that tried to beat her also since Pearl Harbor and didn't ...
Gamblers haven't been trying to beat her until Saturday.

She's faced field after field where she should have been 1/20 on paper all year long.

The only female horse of any ability that she has beat this year (Life Is Sweet) shares the exact same running style as her. That means that if the pace is against Zenyatta - it's also against Life Is Sweet. One won't get a tactical edge on the other and the best will always win.

Absolutely no one with a clue could have bet against her at level weight in her prep either.

She's rabidly loved by people who like 1/5 shots and by pretty horsey people.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:39 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
For me, or for you? I suggest you need two corneal transplants. One so that you can read what I actually said, and the other to help you learn to watch a race. If you think that's a top 5 or 10 race run in the 50 years you've been watching races, then frankly, you are beyond clueless.

Have you signed up with AARP yet?




I'm not sure how to react to that. Maybe "Huh?" or "Where did you learn reading comprehension? Perhaps you should have gone to school instead of learning how to read by being taught how to order off the McDonald's menu"

If you are asking me to name a race that was more impressive than this Classic, how about the Preakness from earlier this year? Oh yeah, I can't use that one since you already mocked that possibility above. How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?

Listen man, I never said her race wasn't at all impressive. What I did say was that the track announcer grossly overreacted.




Ugh.
No you said the " race was not bad " and the track announcer over reacted ...I was commenting SPECIFICALLY on that quote--NOT BAD ..

No need for granny glasses, gingko biloba or AARP ..

Not bad is sort of an under reaction as you continue to qualify your being less than impressed with the race by saying you have seen many better this year--that is without naming them originally ... Now you have ...

Speaking of sight, vision and reading comprehension--where did I quantify my remark " right up there " as to the the top five or twenty or any number qualifying exactly what NUMBER I WOULD ASSIGN TO ' RIGHT UP THERE ' ????in reference to the good races I have seen in 50 years ???

NOWHERE except in your head ... Exactly--reading comprehension ..

The whole enchilada --point missed, entirely ...

Do you get it now ???

Uber ugh ...
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:45 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Gamblers haven't been trying to beat her until Saturday.

She's faced field after field where she should have been 1/20 on paper all year long.

The only female horse of any ability that she has beat this year (Life Is Sweet) shares the exact same running style as her. That means that if the pace is against Zenyatta - it's also against Life Is Sweet. One won't get a tactical edge on the other and the best will always win.

Absolutely no one with a clue could have bet against her at level weight in her prep either.

She's rabidly loved by people who like 1/5 shots and by pretty horsey people.

I respectfully disagree--people have put it out there that they have tried to beat her long before the Classic and maybe right here as well ...

Are you saying the clueless are in danger of extinction---I think you know better ...

I am sure she is loved by chalkeaters and pretty pony people, as sure as I am she is loved by those who appreciate a good horse ...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:46 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Funny thing Prudery. I'm neither a numbers guy or a bettor.

Sorta like you not having a clue I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:46 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?
Phone Chatter!!!!!

YAY!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:48 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Funny thing Prudery. I'm neither a numbers guy or a bettor.

Sorta like you not having a clue I guess.

No resemblance whatsoever ....
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:51 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery

Speaking of sight, vision and reading comprehension--where did I quantify my remark " right up there " as to the the top five or twenty or any number qualifying exactly what NUMBER I WOULD ASSIGN TO ' RIGHT UP THERE ' ????in reference to the good races I have seen in 50 years ???

NOWHERE except in your head ... Exactly--reading comprehension ..
So, when you said this in your first post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...
Way up there meant in the top 500 races you've seen? To me, Denman's reaction was for an all time great race performance, and by you saying it's way up there, you are agreeing.

Why else say it's way up there in great races of the last 50 years? Would you really be saying that if it was the 175th best race you've ever seen?

Or are you going to try to worm your way out of what you said?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:53 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Phone Chatter!!!!!

YAY!!!!
I threw that one in for you!

Come to think of it though, Sardula and Heavenly Prize were better horses than what was in this Classic.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:54 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Go to the eso forum.

Sightseek just dissed your favorite movie.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:10 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
They are amazing aren't they.

When you read a lot of that silly stuff you get from the racing press ... it's pretty easy to see why guys like Andy Beyer and Steve Crist are as great as they are.

With those two .. you're talking about guys who are both excellent writers and have a great understanding of the sport in terms of both racing and gambling.

Those two names are company I never have to worry about keeping ... because I couldn't pass a 10th grade English class and only can get hired as a small fry racing writer because of my ability in other areas.

It's the exact opposite with a lot of the guys you see writing on racing ... they're very good writers in a lot of cases ... but they don't really understand racing. Some of them out and out have no idea what they're talking about.

You do also have some that are very good writers/handicappers that have a good understanding of racing .. but have a less than stellar understanding of the betting aspect.
It's a good observation- horse racing is a unique sport in that it is intrinsically tied to gambling, and any sort of informed gambling on racing requires some pretty good math skills. And there aren't many people who are equally strong in math and in writing, and sports writing, to be specific.

(I also think it's one of the big reasons horse racing has trouble with the casual fans- nobody told them there would be math. )
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:16 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
So, when you said this in your first post:



Way up there meant in the top 500 races you've seen? To me, Denman's reaction was for an all time great race performance, and by you saying it's way up there, you are agreeing.

Why else say it's way up there in great races of the last 50 years? Would you really be saying that if it was the 175th best race you've ever seen?

Or are you going to try to worm your way out of what you said?

I don't try to worm out of anything ...

I said I did not quantify my remark--so now you ask me to ??? Oh my ..

I will be very patient here--I found that race a great one that I described as " way up there " ..

When I used that term, I was not thinking in pop chart form--still there ???

Since I have ostensibly seen many good races over 50 years, revamping a list in order of subjective response I do not do, hence no numbers...

I am not easily impressed--so many races others think great I do not--like the Preakness this year--a great accomplishment, not a great race, IMO , and probablyt exactly the way you feel about this race. Maybe ..

This Classic was a great race to me, as multiple accomplishments were achieved in one fell swoop and answers answered at least to me ...

A great race because this mare sauntered by the boys exactly how she sauntered by all the girls--no regard for pace or opposition, same result ... FAB .. EASY..

Do I think it was a great field ??? No--but the field was significant enough, and the best that could be mustered that day ..

That is my opinion--is there a number for it ??? Maybe ..

But a favorite to me as a Classic it will be, and the best one I have seen in a while ...

Better than the JCGC with Slew. Affirmed and Exceller--no ..

More dramatic than Arazi??? Subjective, but not as flashy visually ..

Get it now---dinner awaits ...
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-11-2009, 06:21 PM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Rip Van Winkle ran 3/5ths of a second faster than 2yo's in his last race .. and that was at his best distance.
That was his 2nd Group I win in a row. His 3rd race back, in July, was a 2nd place finish (by a length) to European Horse-of-the-Millenium, Sea of Stars. I think it's fair to consider Rip Van Winkle a top-notch European, and lately that's been enough to threaten our best. According to multiple observers (and I mean before the race) he shipped terribly and had major problems acclimating to his Santa Anita environs. His connections admitted as much in the days just before the race.

--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-11-2009, 06:41 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Yeah --- it all could be. The connections talked about feet problems or something.

I don't follow Euro racing at all - let alone rabidly enough to have solid opinions up and down on Euro horses.

His last race though ... the final time was highly unimpressive when compared with other races that day at the same distance.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-11-2009, 10:09 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Taking nothing at all from Zenyatta because that was a fantastic race, but it drives me nuts to read some articles declaring this year's Classic field as the "deepest" or "toughest" field.
I read the same thing in at least one article. I thought it was absurd. This was in no way a strong field. This was a very weak Handicap division this year. Comparing this year to recent years, there were no Ghostzappers, Roses In Mays, Pleasantly Perfects, Invasors, Curlins, Bernardinis, Invasors, Saint Liams, etc. this year.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-12-2009, 07:09 AM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

drugs i still think if you put mike smith on Gio Ponti and Dominguez on Zenyatta she doesn't win the race

smith gave her an perfect textbook ride for the pro surface as he should because he's a west coast based jock . ramon, a big a inner dirt specialit made the cardinal mistake of not getting his horse over to the best part of the track for the stretch drive - not only did he lose becuase he was on the deader part of the track , gio ponti never saw zenyatta and never had a chance to look her in the eye , if ramon could have gotten outside of her , we could have seen a different result

jermey rose made the same mistake in the derby , he was too far inside on derby day with afleet alex and mike smith hit the best part of the track on that day 10 wide with the 50/1 shot
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-12-2009, 08:59 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
drugs i still think if you put mike smith on Gio Ponti and Dominguez on Zenyatta she doesn't win the race

smith gave her an perfect textbook ride for the pro surface as he should because he's a west coast based jock . ramon, a big a inner dirt specialit made the cardinal mistake of not getting his horse over to the best part of the track for the stretch drive - not only did he lose becuase he was on the deader part of the track , gio ponti never saw zenyatta and never had a chance to look her in the eye , if ramon could have gotten outside of her , we could have seen a different result

jermey rose made the same mistake in the derby , he was too far inside on derby day with afleet alex and mike smith hit the best part of the track on that day 10 wide with the 50/1 shot

While Smith's ride was professional even Chantal would have gotten Zenyatta up. What makes you believe Zenyatta wasn't capable of starting her run a quarter of a mile sooner on the outside and winning by the same length.
She is a terrific mare it was an awesome race, clearly not some Classic that goes down in history as an all time race but it certainly was great theather and a fine way for a great horse to out in style.

Look all story's cant be as wonderful and have the terriffic ending that Zensational did..Now that was the final chapter of an immense champion.lol
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.