Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:50 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

so, basically cm...what you're saying is that opening the door to gays is opening the door to all sort of freakish stuff....like it's a gateway lifestyle or something? sorry, i don't see a correlation between two consenting adults wanting to be married and polygamists or child molesters. but you seem to see a connection. interesting.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:51 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
I'm having trouble understanding why more than two persons can't enter into a marriage. Can someone help me to understand why wwe can't have polygamous marriages if all parties are consenting adults?

No moral objections, please
i've never really thought about it to be honest with you. i'd never enter into one. i can't imagine sharing my husband with another woman. i just don't see it working.
some people might. but then, some people are into lots of things. i don't see a compelling reason to allow it imo.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:53 PM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
I'll steal the words of another famous person, GPK

"GFY"


"Just don't tell anyone's pastor, rabbi, etc.
what they can say or not in their houses of worship, when same-sex marriage
becomes legal across the land."


Ok I wont, never planned to. They are entitled to their own opinion, but their opinion should not be allowed to become law, especially when it takes rights away from others.

You people bore me.

My work is done.

It was fun while it lasted.


Glad I could bore you... go choke on a dick please.

Where's Morty when I really need him - VAPORIZE THIS SOB!
I just saw this now...and I am not really here.I think you know that.


This is the TrueSwine I already vaporized ...only Steve's sense of "what is the wrong thing to do here?"....erased it all.


So he was bored, his wurg is done here and he was done before it lasted...........good.

He's gone on his own.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:56 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut
I don't know, why don't you ask them?
oh wait- you can't

so your logic is ?

The majority of the tax dollars goes to the military?

What if the majority of spending shifts away from the military ?

Will the person doing the tax dollar shift away from the military hate our soldiers?

My thinking is that the military is just one thing. it may cost the most but it is still one thing my tax dollars go to. When I say I disagree with the majority of stuff the government spends my money on, I mean all the other bs programs like public education <The public schools in my area are nothing more than drop out factories with a 49% graduation rate. >

as for the topic at hand... If gays can marry, when will people be allowed to marry their pets? (Who are you to judge )

Where I work ~ gay co-habitation couples are allowed to claim their partners on their healthcare benefits but.............

if you are just living with your girlfriend/ boyfriend and are not gay you cannot.

I guess it's because gays cannot get married where a couple living together can and choose not to.

Why should people, that choose to be gay, given benefits that "straight" people who choose not to get married are denied.
lori? a choice? i've always argued that you're born that way...but you know, i've never asked anyone.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:57 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

I knew he'd come to help me


(he must have thought it was safe and then re-vaporized when he saw your non-presence)
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:57 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
...i don't see a compelling reason to allow it imo.


First off, I'm not a big fan of the Mormons in general, and I'm pro Gay rights.
However, just because you don't see a compelling reason for polygamous marriage, it doesn't mean others(i.e traditional Mormons and many others around the world) don't like the idea.

I don't like the idea of polygamous marriage, either, but I'm having a hard time justifying why, if not for a personal preference objection(just like some might not prefer blacks and whites marrying)
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:00 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
First off, I'm not a big fan of the Mormons in general, and I'm pro Gay rights.
However, just because you don't see a compelling reason for polygamous marriage, it doesn't mean others(i.e traditional Mormons and many others around the world) don't like the idea.

I don't like the idea of polygamous marriage, either, but I'm having a hard time justifying why, if not for a personal preference objection(just like some might not prefer blacks and whites marrying)
I see your point.. the reason I can come up for justifying why they shouldnt be allowed is that people could take advantage of the rights given by the govn't through marriage... i.e. marrying a lot of people and then getting 10 different social security checks after their multiple spouse's pass away.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:02 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
First off, I'm not a big fan of the Mormons in general, and I'm pro Gay rights.
However, just because you don't see a compelling reason for polygamous marriage, it doesn't mean others(i.e traditional Mormons and many others around the world) don't like the idea.

I don't like the idea of polygamous marriage, either, but I'm having a hard time justifying why, if not for a personal preference objection(just like some might not prefer blacks and whites marrying)

i always figured it was mostly guys who would be for the idea.
but, like i said, the whole deal is about allowing two adults marry in some circumstances, but not in others. if there is no legal reason (precluding age, too closely related for example, or not free from previous legal contract) then i don't see how the govt can say yes to some, no to others. really, that's all it comes down to.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:04 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
lori? a choice? i've always argued that you're born that way...but you know, i've never asked anyone.
I saw that... almost responded to him but didnt have the energy at the time..

If it was a choice I'd be with men in a second... they are MUCH easier to deal with than women IMO... less hormonal changes and what not.

Men are easier to understand (again my opinion) - and maybe that is because my brain works like a mans.


But then again... I do have the choice to be with a man regardless of how my heart and sex organs feel. But then I'd be uncomfortable my whole life and living a lie.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:06 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Wow. You really said a mouthful here.

Your last sentence belongs in some kind of Hall of Shame.
along with the marrying pets sentence...

people like Wingnut and cmfwhatever and Bush make me feel ashamed to be a republican
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:18 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

I will add that I agree with Wingnut... that if gay couples in a domestic partnership are allowed to get med insurance benefits... than straight couples in domestic partnerships should also get the same benefits.

I'm for equality for all.. not more rights for gays, and less rights for hetero's.

Equal for all.


but wingnut.. that choice comment you made was absurd & and sure as heck doesnt help your argument or cred.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:38 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default

I'll accept the two person marriage rule. There is the problem of multiple social security checks for the widows and widowers. Then, that brings up the whole problem of everyone within the polygamous marriage needed to have a contract with each and every other individual involved in this "marriage".

Now, let's talk about age of consent for marriage. Do we all agree that 16 years old is the right choice? Or do some think it should be higher? Lower? Different for boys than girls?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:54 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Whoever said gays and lesbians wanted to get married in a church anyway?
Maybe they want to go to Vegas and get drunk like a movie star and get married .
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-12-2008, 07:44 PM
letswastemoney's Avatar
letswastemoney letswastemoney is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 2,561
Default

There should be a little provision saying that churches would reserve the right to not marry gays. But I don't see the problem in letting a government official marry them.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-12-2008, 07:58 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by letswastemoney
There should be a little provision saying that churches would reserve the right to not marry gays. But I don't see the problem in letting a government official marry them.
They already reserve the right not to marry people ,usually people who want to get married in a church have several meetings with the pastor or priest , if the pastor or priest doesnt see fit that they should be married they can say no.
Its sorta like the right to refuse service to anyone.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:00 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu
They already reserve the right not to marry people ,usually people who want to get married in a church have several meetings with the pastor or priest , if the pastor or priest doesnt see fit that they should be married they can say no.
Its sorta like the right to refuse service to anyone.

When are we getting married?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:01 PM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
When are we getting married?
When your joint falls off.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:03 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortimer
When your joint falls off.

Git outta here
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:04 PM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Fine.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:16 PM
Rileyoriley's Avatar
Rileyoriley Rileyoriley is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Snowy Woods
Posts: 4,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortimer
When your joint falls off.


You may not really be here but it's nice to see your humor lingers on my friend.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.