No bid contracts? Deja Vu all over again

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Mortimer

She's not going to rub either location.

sorry mort-just don't think hubby would understand.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

If nobody said anything, those clothes were going back to Alaska.

and that is very possible. but no doubt someone started questioning how she got some fancy threads, since i doubt she could afford it.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by Danzig

sorry mort-just don't think hubby would understand.

Well...OK. Do it to your tubby...I mean hubby..first.


Then do it to me. I would think he would understand it if you do it in that sequence.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I actually thought the joke was amusing and can't stand Palin, but are you serious with this nonsense? Why did she have the kid? Who the fucl< cares why she had it? She got pregnant, probably knew what was up and kept it because she is against abortion. I have a sibling that was born after my mother was 40. They are fine. Lots of people have kids in their 40's. While the chances do go up for stuff like Down Syndrome, it's not like she is crazy for having a child after 40. Try and cut back to an 8 ball a day. It might mellow you out a bit.

I know a 300 lb Catholic Lady that had an absolute litter of kids n' the cherry on top had Downs Syndrome. I would imagine that was the last one(I'm sure she was 40-45 for the last one.) I'm talking about the risks involved when the woman is 40 on up, and already had atleast 3 or 4 kids.

That family photo just reeks of fertility.
They all ooze babies.
Drop em like fine hens.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I understand the risks are greater. I guess I don't get questioning why someone would or wouldn't have a child. Maybe they wanted another one.

Well, with what we now know about the risks, I think it's stupid for any woman to have her 5th child at age 43. She took a stupid gamble(and lost.) This is an excellent reason to question her decision making. It was a very poor decision she made. I think it was stupid. This was 2007/8. O.K., I don't know when your sibling was born, but in 2007/8 it was obviously a huge known risk for Sarah to have a 5th child at age 43. It's an excellent example of stupidity.

[Mortimer]

Steven H. Crist.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Looks like a donut maker put that cinnamon-crumb donut coating on Sarah's face.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

As I have said, I can't stand Palin, but you're reaching.

Reaching? ....Any woman that has her 5th child at 43 is is gambling big time.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Reaching? ....Any woman that has her 5th child at 43 is is gambling big time.

Has an irrevocable opinion about everything.

Reinforcing the az.zhole axiom.


Wok good.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Reaching? ....Any woman that has her 5th child at 43 is is gambling big time.

but her gene pool wins regardless. and she already has a 17 yr old breeder.

1,000 years from now everyone will oppose both abortion and contraception. it's natural selection.

[Mortimer]

Fillies up 3-1...by the way.

[hi_im_god]

risk be damned.

i'm looking for applicants to bear me 43 children over the next 5 years.

pm if interested.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Reaching? ....Any woman that has her 5th child at 43 is is gambling big time.

^^^^ Mouth suing brain for lack of support.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

You're missing the point, badly. There are risks with any pregnancy. Sure, in the situation Palin was in she was at risk more than others, but who cares? They made a decision and are living with it. Why the hell do you care who has kids and at what age?

Yeah, I don't think it's kool to make Down Syndrome kids.You don't seem to mind. The more the merrier. This could for sure have been avoided. This is not random. To specifically answer your question, what she did is make a very poor decision. They say she is qualified and capable to possibly be President(and be responsible to make difficult important decisions.) I don't want somebody this stupid making any decisions about our country. Like it or not, having a 5th child at age 43 is incredibly stupid. She wants to be V.P. of the United States. Her decisions are being looked at, and this decision was a very stupid one. She fails to show the judgment necessary for this job. You want to overlook a decision this butt ignorant, then be my guest.

[Mortimer]

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list.

Well no it's not.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Yeah, I don't think it's kool to make Down Syndrome kids.You don't seem to mind. The more the merrier. This could for sure have been avoided. This is not random. To specifically answer your question, what she did is make a very poor decision. They say she is qualified and capable to possibly be President(and be responsible to make difficult important decisions.) I don't want somebody this stupid making any decisions about our country. Like it or not, having a 5th child at age 43 is incredibly stupid. She wants to be V.P. of the United States. Her decisions are being looked at, and this decision was a very stupid one. She fails to show the judgment necessary for this job. You want to overlook a decision this butt ignorant, then be my guest.

^^^^ Mom was 46 when she gave birth to him.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I think that's the most ironic part of this whole thing. SCUDS, who without a doubt has some sort of imbalance whether it be mental, chemical, etc doesn't want Down Syndrome babies born.

I laughed.

I couldn't resist.


And he wants to be a MLB manager.

[Mortimer]

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about other posters on the site.

^^^^ Folding under direct posting pressure.