Stupid breeding question

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Let's say Dreaming of Anna turns out to be a superhorse (just give me this one for the sake of this question....because it addresses a more general idea later) and wins the majority of her career races, and racks up several grade I wins as a 3yo and as an older mare.

She goes to the shed and produces another precocious, top-level two/three year old.

Does Lewis Michael, by default, become a sought after stallion? Obviously, he's generally always overmatched in graded races, but is not a completely useless horse by any stretch. If his full sister becomes a good producer, does he generally get perceived as a good pedigree starting point?

Not only is Lewis Michael a full sibling to (soon to be) champion 2-year-old filly Dreaming of Anna.

But, he comes from a multiple turf stakes winning dam who's kin to champion turf horse Kitten's Joy.

Lewish Micheal's 2nd dam is also kin to Down the Aisle, who was a millionaire turf specialist, and won a Grade 1 race at age 7.

His 3rd dam is also kin to a Mother Goose winner.

His overall pedigree will obviously enhance his value as a stallion prospect. However, I'd only seen him being sought after by some breeder looking for a young stallion in the lower-middle price range, that might have the potential to throw a good grass miler...and wouldn't figure to be a liability as a dirt sire.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by Scav

Look at Unforgettable Max....I think he is a full to Afleet Alex (can't verify with pedigreequery right now) but he didn't do much on the track.

Eavesdropper is another one

Unforgettable Max trivia: In the '04 Tom Fool, Ghostzapper went off at 7/5 off the layoff. The 2nd choice in the race (field of 4)? Unforgettable Max at a ridiculously low 9/5. He finished a distant 3rd.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

UM also opened up the favorite over Ghostzapper, in the early betting of that race.

I vividly remember that day. My parents throw a gigantic 4th of July party every year....I blew it all off so I could watch Ghostzapper's 4yo debut, and bet a few other horses I really loved on the undercard.

To say my mother was pissed at me was an understatement.

I wasn't able to watch Candy Ride's American Handicap on July 4th '03, Left Bank's Tom Fool on July 4th '02, or Xtra Heat's Prioress on July 4th '01---I wasn't about to spend another July 4th with my family and nitwit relatives.

Sometimes you just have to put your foot down.

[Thoroughbred Fan]

For any stallion, the criteria, in order of significance for his prospects (price and book), are: racing record, pedigree, and conformation.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Thoroughbred Fan

For any stallion, the criteria, in order of significance for his prospects (price and book), are: racing record, pedigree, and conformation.

TB Fan,
You might be entirely correct in your analysis of priorities.
To me, I wouldn't put racing record first. Some others don't either.
Mary Lou Whitney's broodmares are unraced. Pedigree plays a larger factor.
I've bred several to a son of Dayjur that got injured before he raced. However, his conformation justified his 500K purchase price.
We'll just have to wait until this spring and summer to see how they do on the track.
In breeding, I look for a sire that compensates for the dam's weaknesses.
Just my two pennies.
Also, go back and read Pgardn's post. I think he's right.