Attention: Members Of Derby Trail ! - Page 2

Past Post · #21 07-02-2007, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

There would have to be some sort of agreements and write ups.

1) Starting bankroll, January 1st through December 31st, dissolved on December 31st and December 31st only
2) Only Double carryover days
3) Only California or Churchill (After Derby Day)
4) Three/Four people control the tickets, others are simply considered investors

That type of format is what I think would work,its just a matter of putting it together.Positive outlook is important in making this a goal.

whodey17 · #22 07-02-2007, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

What you could do is create a business and let it have its own Balance/income statements, taxes come from there, and then the company is dissolved every year.....

Not every person is a good capper at every track. At Hollywood, I would want Scavs to be one of the handicappers and in KY I would want Hooves etc etc.

ninetoone · #23 07-02-2007, 08:36 PM

I'd consider jumping in on a big ticket for the BC pick six...

Past Post · #24 07-02-2007, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninetoone

I'd consider jumping in on a big ticket for the BC pick six...

Thank you sir,you shall be put on a list if one does happen.

Rudeboyelvis · #25 07-02-2007, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17

Not every person is a good capper at every track. At Hollywood, I would want Scavs to be one of the handicappers and in KY I would want Hooves etc etc.

I personally would not submit an opinion outside of New York

Scav · #26 07-02-2007, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17

Not every person is a good capper at every track. At Hollywood, I would want Scavs to be one of the handicappers and in KY I would want Hooves etc etc.

Again, you have to circuitize it. Something like this would only be worthwhile in California, you probably get about 20 opportunies a year in California for a 1 million dollar pot, if you got 10k as your starting bankroll, you would have 20 $500 tickets....

Now, I wouldn't recommend just doing $500 tickets but it is the idea that you really would only need 10 people at 1k a piece

whodey17 · #27 07-02-2007, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

I personally would not submit an opinion outside of New York

I wouldnt submit an opinion on any track.

Past Post · #28 07-02-2007, 08:42 PM

Trust me when and if this does take off,there will be a lot of interested players and investors.

whodey17 · #29 07-02-2007, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

Again, you have to circuitize it. Something like this would only be worthwhile in California, you probably get about 20 opportunies a year in California for a 1 million dollar pot, if you got 10k as your starting bankroll, you would have 20 $500 tickets....

Now, I wouldn't recommend just doing $500 tickets but it is the idea that you really would only need 10 people at 1k a piece

That makes sense. Plus CA has those guaranteed $1mm pick 6 pools. I would want to stick to only 3 venues--NY, CA and Churchill (put Churchill rarely gets to a $100k carryover).

ArlJim78 · #30 07-02-2007, 08:43 PM

I think you would want many more than 3-4 cappin, so as to increase your chances of not missing anything. For example you have like 20 people capping and send the results up to the final group which can be 3-4 people to make the final decisions and ticket structure. just an idea.

hoovesupsideyourhead · #31 07-02-2007, 08:45 PM

im out..good luck with this ...its a nightmare on your street...

Past Post · #32 07-02-2007, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

I think you would want many more than 3-4 cappin, so as to increase your chances of not missing anything. For example you have like 20 people capping and send the results up to the final group which can be 3-4 people to make the final decisions and ticket structure. just an idea.

Yes Jim,not a bad idea at all.Once the plays are out,the ticket stucture is not that hard.

Past Post · #33 07-02-2007, 08:50 PM

Ok,if someone wants to meet me to form this or talk over the phone feel free to do so.I can get 2 investors for sure with no say in the capping,just invest their money.E-mail if you wish.Will be in Chicago for the next 2 weeks.

Scav · #34 07-02-2007, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17

That makes sense. Plus CA has those guaranteed $1mm pick 6 pools. I would want to stick to only 3 venues--NY, CA and Churchill (put Churchill rarely gets to a $100k carryover).

Only day Churchill is worthwhile is the day after the Derby, there is serious value the day after if there was a pick six carryover.....Card is usually pretty weak because everyone tried to run Derby week.

Lava · #35 07-02-2007, 08:58 PM

I would be up put money up without having an input on the picks.

Habersham000 · #36 07-02-2007, 09:04 PM

It was done before a long time ago on ESPN message board with Byk running it if I remember correctly.....I think they went after a large Pick 6 carryover...

ArlJim78 · #37 07-02-2007, 09:05 PM

I would be interested in buying in, and in the cappin as long as its not NY.

philcski · #38 07-02-2007, 09:09 PM

I'd be interested, but handicapping wise I'm only worthwhile in NY or KY. Cal, forgetaboutit.

Scav · #39 07-02-2007, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

I would be interested in buying in, and in the cappin as long as its not NY.

Can't do NY, 500k pools pay 3k but I guess you can because you get a 20/1 and it pays 40k

Mortimer · #40 07-02-2007, 09:12 PM

This is about the stupidest idea I have ever heard of.

From a purely logistical standpoint of course.

Oh it's stupid from any standpoint.

Why not just call out for John Dillinger to hold the money?