![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In track (bike) racing, the rider who can push the bigger gear has a huge advantage. While he can go faster than the other cyclists while spinning less RPMs, he also needs to be stronger and have more stamina in order to push the bigger gear. Given enough distance of ground, and assuming an UNobstructed path, this rider will always win. The others might spin smoother and quicker than he can but in the long run he'll be going the fastest. Simple physics. And that's exactly what happened in the Preakness. Curlin took a long time to get into gear. Despite lagging early, a needlessly wide trip, and taking longer to change in the lane than the others, when he finally got that big gear moving, it was all over. That was a TURF TYPE late move on the dirt. Now, how does this horse lose in the Belmont? There won't be a 20 horse obstacle course (like the Derby). Hard Spun can go as slow or as fast as he wants. If he goes too fast, he's cooked. If he goes too slow, when it comes time to sprint in the lane, he can't match the bigger gear pusher. Simple as that. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Dosage is garbage. Garbage in, garbage out.
Check out Conduit Mare Profiles for these horses, which appear at the bottom of the pedigrees for subscribers at PedQuery. Curlin's has 9 presences on the speed wing, and 13 in the stamina wing. Hard Spun has 10 on the speed side and 13 on the stamina side. Another thing to note is the GSV (Genetic Strength Value), developed by the man behind the matings that produced St. Jovite and Farda Amiga, etc. Curlin's is 69.80 and Hard Spun's is 79.96; the higher the number, the better quality the pedigree is for classic distances. (Teuflesberg, in contrast, has a GSV of 58.94). If you have to have numbers rather than a reasoned analysis of the entire pedigree, I suggest both of these in concert as a replacement for the deeply flawed Roman Dosage numbers. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Pedigree Ann--
You may think dosage is gargage, but missing out on the chance for this brilliant insight was well worth all the ciphering: Digger - DI 4.33 CD 1.00 - Bred for eating and pooping |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, I'm not sure what he meant.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |