![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Zenyatta is a great horse. She is the best synthetic runner in the 5 year history of the synthetic track proliferation in the US. She proved that in the BC Classic by beating horses who largely specialized in dirt or turf. Where that SPECIALTY rates in the bigger picture is highly questionable. Until she beats a good field on dirt (Apple Blossom? Please), you can't start comparing her to the others who stand out in a 100+ year history of dirt racing. I still don't understand why people can't differentiate the two. How can you elevate synthetic superiority and not mention turf greats like Goldlikova or Ouija Board who went to battle with and defeat the best turf horses in the world multiple times?
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Zenyatta is a sensational story, and a great mare. My only problem with her connections is that they continue to cater to the California circuit by running her in the same races every year. Bringing her back this year, should have meant new challenges, not just another reason to have "Zenyatta bobblehead day" at hollywood park.
However, it's not her fault that california has synthetic tracks. Nor is it her fault that John Sherrifs doesn't have an operation like Assumussen or Pletcher where he can just easily send her to 10 different tracks in the country where they have stalls and assistants ready to take care of her. But even the most ardent Zenyatta supporters have to be tired of watching her in these restricted races in California where the competition (usually) is subpar. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it - Lou Holtz |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm late for whatever because of this thread....
![]()
__________________
Good Luck......and may a Derby Trailer lead the way to the window! Ed |