Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-25-2010, 02:00 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms View Post
I wouldn't get too much hope on NYCOTB going away in this legislative session, due to union influence. The NYRA loan should have been an easy lift, but they had to put this in the emergency extender instead of doing it as a stand-alone bill as a result of union influence with Senate Democrats: http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories...storyID=934349
I do know that you are right about the union issue which is a huge problem on the OTB end. In fact, unions are a huge problem that NY, and virtually any state government around the country for that matter, has in the fight to balance budgets and reduce spending in this economy.

That being said, with the mess that Frucher has created NYCOTB will probably never be more ripe for the opportunity to merge into the racetracks. Considering that the other regional OTB's are also crying they are paying too much to the tracks, it would be nice to see this BS backfire and for the legislature to eliminate all of them, cut out the middleman, apportion the business amongst the state's tracks and reduce the takeout as well on off track wagers (which likely would even lead to more handle and more profit to the tracks).

I can't see why NYRA and the other tracks could not assume the union contracts and then be subject to negotiating them when they expire which would then have no affect on the unions with regard to a merger, effectively neutralizing them. More of an obstacle in my lay opinion (and I only am a layperson making suggestions based upon common sense) is the patronage issue, even if the unions are so far up the Democrats azzes with their contributions such that the legislators bow to their unreasonable wishes.

If the media really exposed the patronage problem it could force the legislators to eliminate it while having the benefit of giving the tracks the ability to sustain themselves and stop or severely reduce the drain the industry would put on the State. While this makes too much sense, such things are only fantasies when they would severely hurt contributions to corrupt politicians. Since Patterson has nothing to lose, he might relish in eliminating the patronage to those who turned on him, but I realize that I am dreaming.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.