Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 03-19-2007, 03:43 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Smarty Jones was the favorite in that Derby....wasn't he?
Morning line fave was The Cliff's Edge, but Smarty went in the gate as the favorite.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 03-19-2007, 03:50 PM
Withers's Avatar
Withers Withers is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pimlico
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Smarty Jones was the favorite in that Derby....wasn't he?
Yeah, he was on the day, but Smarty definitely wasn't the favorite back in February when KG insisted to forum members that he would win the Derby...shucks, KG, I'm probably embarassing you, right?

Anyway, for anyone who remembers, it was certainly KG's moment of glory and thus my regard for his picks, even if they all can't be as good...
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 03-19-2007, 03:52 PM
Grits Grits is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Withers
Now don't you fret: my few pennies go nowhere near the racetrack,
If I fret, its because you don't support the sport, not because of what a poster stated years back.

Horseracing doesn't continue today on those that choose to watch, never putting any money through the windows.

Please tell me that you don't like SLOTS. If so, I'll be ok, I'll cope better. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:01 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Withers
Yeah, he was on the day, but Smarty definitely wasn't the favorite back in February when KG insisted to forum members that he would win the Derby...shucks, KG, I'm probably embarassing you, right?

Anyway, for anyone who remembers, it was certainly KG's moment of glory and thus my regard for his picks, even if they all can't be as good...
this board wasn't around back then unfortunately and his record of selections has tailed off it would seem from that illustrious moment of glory.

He is more known around here for calling Invasor a fraud, that would not even hit the board in the Breeders Cup. When Invasor returned in the Donn he said that due to the layoff he would finish no better than third.

Oh yeah, he basically guaranteed that Bernardini would break Secretariats track record for 10 panels in the Breeders Cup.

After the Las Virgenes he came on to claim that he was not impressed by Rags To Riches and that she beat nothing. This is when everyone was going gaga over how she won despite being 5-6 wide on both turns. Then when she beats the same horses with a better trip he now says she should go to the Kentucky Derby. One of the quickest reevaluations in history.

I'm sure these are just the highlights, if you do some research you'll come up with many other juicy nuggets. I'm just hitting the high spots.

But I'll give him credit for the Smarty pick, I was not on his bandwagon early on, until the Derby win that is.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:08 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Genesis, Chapter 1, Verse 1....In the beginning, Jessica created the heavens and the earth....
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:09 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Genesis, Chapter 1, Verse 1....In the beginning, Jessica created the heavens and the earth....
Awww Jessica Damnit!
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:18 PM
Withers's Avatar
Withers Withers is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pimlico
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
this board wasn't around back then unfortunately and his record of selections has tailed off it would seem from that illustrious moment of glory.

He is more known around here for calling Invasor a fraud, that would not even hit the board in the Breeders Cup. When Invasor returned in the Donn he said that due to the layoff he would finish no better than third.

Oh yeah, he basically guaranteed that Bernardini would break Secretariats track record for 10 panels in the Breeders Cup.

After the Las Virgenes he came on to claim that he was not impressed by Rags To Riches and that she beat nothing. This is when everyone was going gaga over how she won despite being 5-6 wide on both turns. Then when she beats the same horses with a better trip he now says she should go to the Kentucky Derby. One of the quickest reevaluations in history.

I'm sure these are just the highlights, if you do some research you'll come up with many other juicy nuggets. I'm just hitting the high spots.

But I'll give him credit for the Smarty pick, I was not on his bandwagon early on, until the Derby win that is.
Well, maybe his picks have worsened since 2004 on the previous board... All I know is that in 2004, he was on the money early, early...and I wish I had supported the sport that year by betting big time...but since when doesn't watching horseracing also entail support of the sport? If there were more fans watching horseracing, believe me: the Smarty Jones of the world and their connections would be earning huge amounts of dosh on *endorsements* (not just at stud) and Yum! wouldn't be able to afford to sponsor the KD. (And I lie: I do bet -- modestly -- and lose plenty at the track. I mean that I don't wager through any offtrack facility). I personally believe the emphasis on betting (yes, it does support the sport currently) is contributing to its demise. People also bet on March Madness, but they are mad about the teams. Horseracing needs more people who are mad about the sport, period, and for whom the betting is a sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:19 PM
Withers's Avatar
Withers Withers is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pimlico
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grits
If I fret, its because you don't support the sport, not because of what a poster stated years back.

Horseracing doesn't continue today on those that choose to watch, never putting any money through the windows.

Please tell me that you don't like SLOTS. If so, I'll be ok, I'll cope better. LOL
I don't like slots at all.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:24 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Withers
I don't like slots at all.
Me either... every time I play them, I lose all of my money!
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:30 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Me either... every time I play them, I lose all of my money!

I lose all my money on sluts too....
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:47 PM
Grits Grits is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Miss, Ms, Sir, whatever salutation is valid, you may watch horseracing, but you know absolutely not one whit about what is required to keep this sport alive. NOT ONE. This is a sport that, unlike football, baseball, etc, will not survive through spectatorship and fans that only watch and talk.

It is an INTERACTIVE SPORT ONLY MADE POSSIBLE BY MONEY BEING CHURNED THROUGH THE SYSTEM OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING.

And after you come to understand this, to know that wagering is the entire lifesblood of this game, maybe you will rethink coming here to tell everyone what this sport needs is betting taken away from it as its contributing to its demise.

Your comments, those that I have made bold indicate you, truly, are clueless as to the infrastructure of this sport. And maybe new to it, as well. So, with that in mind, let's talk more, when you know how the game works.

Done on this one.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Withers
Well, maybe his picks have worsened since 2004 on the previous board... All I know is that in 2004, he was on the money early, early...and I wish I had supported the sport that year by betting big time...but since when doesn't watching horseracing also entail support of the sport? If there were more fans watching horseracing, believe me: the Smarty Jones of the world and their connections would be earning huge amounts of dosh on *endorsements* (not just at stud) and Yum! wouldn't be able to afford to sponsor the KD. (And I lie: I do bet -- modestly -- and lose plenty at the track. I mean that I don't wager through any offtrack facility). I personally believe the emphasis on betting (yes, it does support the sport currently) is contributing to its demise. People also bet on March Madness, but they are mad about the teams. Horseracing needs more people who are mad about the sport, period, and for whom the betting is a sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:56 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Withers
I personally believe the emphasis on betting (yes, it does support the sport currently) is contributing to its demise.

Not to pile on, but this is about as confused and incorrect opinion as I've read, and considering some of the nonsense in this thread that's saying quite a lot.

What, pray tell, should the industry emphasize on THAT PROVIDES THE MONEY THAT SUPPORTS THE GAME?
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:09 PM
Grits Grits is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Well as usual I miss all of the fun because I am at work, but this turned into one of the better threads in a long time. I was going to pop in Dumb and Dumber because it was a long day and I needed a laugh. Luckily I read this thread and no need to do it now.
DaHoss, you don't need to, and forgive me please for being so blatant in this comment but Dumb and Dumber's been airing all afternoon, about 4 hours now.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:09 PM
POINTGIVEN1985 POINTGIVEN1985 is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Well as usual I miss all of the fun because I am at work, but this turned into one of the better threads in a long time. I was going to pop in Dumb and Dumber because it was a long day and I needed a laugh. Luckily I read this thread and no need to do it now.
we should thank the person who started this thead
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:18 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Well as usual I miss all of the fun because I am at work, but this turned into one of the better threads in a long time. I was going to pop in Dumb and Dumber because it was a long day and I needed a laugh. Luckily I read this thread and no need to do it now.
The various threads here today put Dumb and Dumber to shame in terms of laughter. You just can't write this stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:37 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
The various threads here today put Dumb and Dumber to shame in terms of laughter. You just can't write this stuff.
Easy there Jim, Dumb and Dumber is pretty damn funny. These threads have been amusing, but that scene where he picks up that snowball and chucks it in her face......that cracks me up every time.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:43 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miraja2
Easy there Jim, Dumb and Dumber is pretty damn funny. These threads have been amusing, but that scene where he picks up that snowball and chucks it in her face......that cracks me up every time.
I'm not that high brow, my favorite is the toilet scene.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:47 PM
kentuckyrosesinmay's Avatar
kentuckyrosesinmay kentuckyrosesinmay is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UNC-CH will always miss Eve Carson. RIP.
Posts: 1,874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grits
Alright now, we gotta settle down here. I don't want to be party to hammering this young person's dreams.

Still, I have to keep in mind that this is part on the online experience, . . . in other words, I couldn't make this S**T up.

Entertainment and all, this it is.
How are you all hammering my dreams? I'm going to college to be a cardiologist, own a very nice horse, and hang out with some of the biggest names in Thoroughbred racing. I'm already in the middle of everything in the industry living the good life. In other words, I was being very facetious in my previous post...
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:59 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

[quote=Cajungator26]I'm not trying to bust her dreams... it's just that things are very different in the racing industry. I have a background in show jumpers, and while I know a few things in regards to that discipline, the same rules don't always apply to racing. A successful race horse doesn't have to win any conformation contests if he/she can run fast and get the job done, you know? I definitely look at conformation (sometimes to the dismay of others, lol), but I think I've finally learned my lesson that how a horse looks in the paddock and in the warm-up isn't always going to be a preview of how they're going to race.[/QUOTE]

i am glad that my losses at the track could let you learn that...
that damn 6 horse. or was it the 2?
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 03-19-2007, 07:02 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
In other words, I was being very facetious in my previous post...

I could be wrong, but " very facetious " might be a lot like " very unique ".

Regardless, thanks for clearing that up for all of us morons on the site. We were all confused for a second that you weren't ridiculously full of yourself.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.