DRF vs Bris vs Equibase

[31lengths]

I know a lot of you like Thorograph however if it was not available, which of these three do you like better and why?

[the_fat_man]

I prefer option #4: FREE

[jwkniska]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

I prefer option #4: FREE

never a bad option!

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

I prefer option #4: FREE

http://simulcapper.com/

[jwkniska]

I like the DRF, especially for turf races, as they put the Tomlinson numbers in, also they put the timeform numbers in for the Euros. The Tomlinson numbers also help a ton for mud races.
DRF also normally gives more back races for the normal track claimers that run frequently than Equibase.

Bris would be my 2nd choice out of the three.

[hurricanefrank]

Originally Posted by 31lengths

I know a lot of you like Thorograph however if it was not available, which of these three do you like better and why?

Most of my betting is turf and late last year I moved to BRIS which I prefer due to their pace figs within a race among other reasons such as sire and dam stats. That said, it's only part of the 'capping process. There's no substitute for watching as many races as possible, whether live, via DVR or replays as is available on twinspires.

[letswastemoney]

It depends. I like BRIS because they give away free PPs for certain trainers and owners. Sometimes you can almost collect a whole card full of free PPs if it's a big day of racing with a lot of graded stakes.

But if I have to pay, then I use DRF.

[sumitas]

BRIS for me. I like the ultimate pp best. It's easy to see the running style of the horse...the prime power numbers are worth a look. They highlight the 3 top horses in several catagories. I'm used to their format.

[hockey2315]

DRF by far. . .

[Danzig]

i've never used anything but drf when i go to the track.

[31lengths]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

DRF by far. . .

why "by far" ?